{
    "system": "GoGuides Verified Text",
    "api_version": "verified-text-v1",
    "status": "ok",
    "response_type": "verified_text_record",
    "source_key": "britannica_1911",
    "source_title": "Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911)",
    "license_code": "public_domain",
    "attribution": null,
    "license_url": null,
    "chunk_id": "1911:martyrology:e326b22c68a2",
    "title": "MARTYROLOGY",
    "section": null,
    "hash_alg": "sha256",
    "hash_sha256": "4f80eaebd85f95d2b2f0f7098e8297054a70b0fed07890bf066dbcb0741369af",
    "normalizer": {
        "name": "ggnorm",
        "version": "1.0"
    },
    "verified_text": "martyrology, a catalogue or list of _martyrs_, or, more exactly, of saints, arranged in the order of their anniversaries. this is the now accepted meaning in the latin church. in the greek church the nearest equivalent to the martyrology is the synaxarium (q.v.). as regards form, we should distinguish between simple martyrologies, which consist merely of an enumeration of names, and historical martyrologies, which also include stories or biographical details. as regards documents, the most important distinction is between local and general martyrologies. the former give a list of the festivals of some particular church; the latter are the result of a combination of several local martyrologies. we may add certain compilations of a factitious character, to which the name of martyrology is given by analogy, e.g. the _martyrologe universel_ of chatelain (1709). as types of local martyrologies we may quote that of rome, formed from the _depositio martyrum_ and the _depositio episcoporum_ of the chronograph of 354; the gothic calendar of ulfila's bible, the calendar of carthage published by mabillon, the calendar of fasts and vigils of the church of tours, going back as far as bishop perpetuus (d. 490), and preserved in the _historia francorum_ (xi. 31) of gregory of tours. the syriac martyrology discovered by wright (_journal of sacred literature_, 1866) gives the idea of a general martyrology. the most important ancient martyrology preserved to the present day is the compilation falsely attributed to st jerome, which in its present form goes back to the end of the 6th century. it is the result of the combination of a general martyrology of the eastern churches, a local martyrology of the church of rome, some general martyrologies of italy and africa, and a series of local martyrologies of gaul. the task of critics is to distinguish between its various constituent elements. unfortunately, this document has reached us in a lamentable condition. the proper names are distorted, repeated or misplaced, and in many places the text is so corrupt that it is impossible to understand it. with the exception of a few traces of borrowings from the passions of the martyrs, the compilation is in the form of a simple martyrology. of the best-known historical martyrologies the oldest are those which go under the name of bede and of florus (_acta sanctorum martii_, vol. ii.); of wandelbert, a monk of prum (842); of rhabanus maurus (c. 845); of ado (d. 875); of notker (896); and of wolfhard (c. 896 v. _analecta bollandiana_, xvii. 11). the most famous is that of usuard (c. 875), on which the roman martyrology was based. the first edition of the roman martyrology appeared at rome in 1583. the third edition, which appeared in 1584, was approved by gregory xiii., who imposed the roman martyrology upon the whole church. in 1586 baronius published his annotated edition, which in spite of its omissions and inaccuracies is a mine of valuable information. the chief works on the martyrologies are those of rosweyde, who in 1613 published at antwerp the martyrology of ado (also edition of giorgi, rome, 1745); of sollerius, to whom we owe a learned edition of usuard (_acta sanctorum junii_, vols. vi. and vii.); and of fiorentini, who published in 1688 an annotated edition of the _martyrology of st jerome_. the critical edition of the latter by j. b. de rossi and mgr. l. duchesne, was published in 1894, in vol. ii. of the _acta sanctorum novembris_. the historical martyrologies taken as a whole have been studied by dom quentin (1908). there are also numerous editions of calendars or martyrologies of less universal interest, and commentaries upon them. mention ought to be made of the famous calendar of naples, commented on by mazocchi (naples, 1744) and sabbatini (naples, 1744). see c. de smedt, _introductio generalis ad historiam ecclesiasticam_ (gandavi, 1876), pp. 127-156; h. matagne and v. de buck in de backer, _bibliotheque des ecrivains de la compagnie de jesus_, 2nd ed., vol. iii. pp. 369-387; de rossi-duchesne, _les sources du martyrologe hieronymien_ (rome, 1885); h. achelis, _die martyrologien, ihre geschichte und ihr wert_ (berlin, 1900); h. delehaye, \"le temoignage des martyrologes,\" in _analecta bollandiana_, xxvi. 78-99 (1907); h. quentin, _les martyrologes historiques du moyen age_ (paris, 1908). (h. de.)",
    "source_url": "https://archive.org/details/EB1911WMF",
    "observed_at": "2026-02-08 18:43:22",
    "integrity": {
        "hash_check": "match",
        "hash_scope": "full_normalized_text",
        "computed_sha256": "4f80eaebd85f95d2b2f0f7098e8297054a70b0fed07890bf066dbcb0741369af"
    },
    "machine_use": {
        "read": true,
        "cite": true,
        "decision": "verified_public_domain_text"
    },
    "goguides_data_license": "https://www.goguides.com/data-license",
    "goguides_data_license_version": "2.0",
    "documentation": {
        "white_paper_url": "https://www.goguides.com/white-paper.php",
        "pdf_url": "https://www.goguides.com/whitepapers/goguides-ai-source-clearance-white-paper.pdf"
    }
}