GoGuides Verified Text
LEBEL
SHA-256 integrity check: match
Source
Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911) / britannica_1911
License
public_domain
Chunk ID
1911:lebel:91e4ebde0bfc
Section
Hash Algorithm
sha256
Stored Hash
3bbdc763ea801702448a036dfb2dcc646bd9e2c8063aad0c356efc393142410b
Computed Hash
3bbdc763ea801702448a036dfb2dcc646bd9e2c8063aad0c356efc393142410b
Normalizer
ggnorm 1.0
Observed
2026-02-08 18:43:19
Source URL
Verified Text
lebel, jean (d. 1370), belgian chronicler, was born near the end of the 13th century. his father, gilles le beal des changes, was an alderman of liege. jean entered the church and became a canon of the cathedral church, but he and his brother henri followed jean de beaumont to england in 1327, and took part in the border warfare against the scots. his will is dated 1369, and his epitaph gives the date of his death as 1370. nothing more is known of his life, but jacques de hemricourt, author of the _miroir des nobles de hesbaye_, has left a eulogy of his character, and a description of the magnificence of his attire, his retinue and his hospitality. hemricourt asserts that he was eighty years old or more when he died. for a long time jean lebel (or le bel) was only known as a chronicler through a reference by froissart, who quotes him in the prologue of his first book as one of his authorities. a fragment of his work, in the ms. of jean d'outremeuse's _mireur des istores_, was discovered in 1847; and the whole of his chronicle, preserved in the library of chalons-sur-marne, was edited in 1863 by l. polain. jean lebel gives as his reason for writing a desire to replace a certain misleading rhymed chronicle of the wars of edward iii. by a true relation of his enterprises down to the beginning of the hundred years' war. in the matter of style lebel has been placed by some critics on the level of froissart. his chief merit is his refusal to narrate events unless either he himself or his informant had witnessed them. this scrupulousness in the acceptance of evidence must be set against his limitations. he takes on the whole a similar point of view to froissart's; he has no concern with national movements or politics; and, writing for the public of chivalry, he preserves no general notion of a campaign, which resolves itself in his narrative into a series of exploits on the part of his heroes. froissart was considerably indebted to him, and seems to have borrowed from him some of his best-known episodes, such as the death of robert the bruce, edward iii. and the countess of salisbury, and the devotion of the burghers of calais. the songs and virelais, in the art of writing which he was, according to hemricourt, an expert, have not come to light. see l. polain, _les vraies chroniques de messire jehan le bel_ (1863); kervyn de lettenhove, _bulletin de la societe d'emulation de bruges_, series ii. vols. vii. and ix.; and h. pirenne in _biographie nationale de belgique_.