GoGuides Verified Text
ITIUS PORTUS
SHA-256 integrity check: match
Source
Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911) / britannica_1911
License
public_domain
Chunk ID
1911:itius portus:7f7bea76fb0a
Section
Hash Algorithm
sha256
Stored Hash
21e4f80753d9d9e7b29d4345167c283f1d4a1afb37c5e38bbe994944dd51586f
Computed Hash
21e4f80753d9d9e7b29d4345167c283f1d4a1afb37c5e38bbe994944dd51586f
Normalizer
ggnorm 1.0
Observed
2026-02-08 18:43:17
Source URL
Verified Text
itius portus, the name given by caesar to the chief harbour which he used when embarking for his second expedition to britain in 54 b.c. (_de bello gallico_, v. 2). it was certainly near the uplands round cape grisnez (_promuntorium itium_), but the exact site has been violently disputed ever since the renaissance of learning. many critics have assumed that caesar used the same port for his first expedition, but the name does not appear at all in that connexion (_b. g._ iv. 21-23). this fact, coupled with other considerations, makes it probable that the two expeditions started from different places. it is generally agreed that the first embarked at boulogne. the same view was widely held about the second, but t. rice holmes in an article in the _classical review_ (may 1909) gave strong reasons for preferring wissant, 4 m. east of grisnez. the chief reason is that caesar, having found he could not set sail from the small harbour of boulogne with even 80 ships simultaneously, decided that he must take another point for the sailing of the "more than 800" ships of the second expedition. holmes argues that, allowing for change in the foreshore since caesar's time, 800 specially built ships could have been hauled above the highest spring-tide level, and afterwards launched simultaneously at wissant, which would therefore have been "commodissimus" (v. 2) or opposed to "brevissimus traiectus" (iv. 21). see t. r. holmes in _classical review_ (may 1909), in which he partially revises the conclusions at which he arrived in his _ancient britain_ (1907), pp. 552-594; that the first expedition started from boulogne is accepted, e.g. by h. stuart jones, in _english historical review_ (1909), xxiv. 115; other authorities in holmes's article.