{
    "system": "GoGuides Verified Text",
    "api_version": "verified-text-v1",
    "status": "ok",
    "response_type": "verified_text_record",
    "source_key": "britannica_1911",
    "source_title": "Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911)",
    "license_code": "public_domain",
    "attribution": null,
    "license_url": null,
    "chunk_id": "1911:hermes:c5ac56cdfab0",
    "title": "HERMES",
    "section": null,
    "hash_alg": "sha256",
    "hash_sha256": "4bee2bdc96401c9beec43993d898c024be995c5ee59f55ef994a128cc5660291",
    "normalizer": {
        "name": "ggnorm",
        "version": "1.0"
    },
    "verified_text": "hermes, georg (1775-1831), german roman catholic theologian, was born on the 22nd of april 1775, at dreyerwalde, in westphalia, and was educated at the gymnasium and university of munster, in both of which institutions he afterwards taught. in 1820 he was appointed professor of theology at bonn, where he died on the 26th of may 1831. hermes had a devoted band of adherents, of whom the most notable was peter josef elvenich (1796-1886), who became professor at breslau in 1829, and in 1870 threw in his lot with the old catholic movement. his works were _untersuchungen uber die innere wahrheit des christenthums_ (munster, 1805), and _einleitung in die christkatholische theologie_, of which the first part, a philosophical introduction, was published in 1819, the second part, on positive theology, in 1829. the _einleitung_ was never completed. his _christkatholische dogmatik_ was published, from his lectures, after his death by two of his students, achterfeld and braun (3 vols., 1831-1834). the _einleitung_ is a remarkable work, both in itself and in its effect upon catholic theology in germany. few works of modern times have excited a more keen and bitter controversy. hermes himself was very largely under the influence of the kantian and fichtean ideas, and though in the philosophical portion of his _einleitung_ he criticizes both these thinkers severely, rejects their doctrine of the moral law as the sole guarantee for the existence of god, and condemns their restricted view of the possibility and nature of revelation, enough remained of purely speculative material to render his system obnoxious to his church. after his death, the contests between his followers and their opponents grew so bitter that the dispute was referred to the papal see. the judgment was adverse, and on the 25th of september 1835 a papal bull condemned both parts of the _einleitung_ and the first volume of the _dogmatik_. two months later the remaining volumes of the _dogmatik_ were likewise condemned. the controversy did not cease, and in 1845 a systematic attempt was made anonymously by f. x. werner to examine and refute the hermesian doctrines, as contrasted with the orthodox catholic faith (_der hermesianismus_, 1845). in 1847 the condemnation of 1835 was confirmed by pius ix. see k. werner, _geschichte der katholischen theologie_ (1866), pp. 405 sqq. hermes trismegistus (\"the thrice greatest hermes\"), an honorific designation of the egyptian hermes, i.e. thoth (q.v.), the god of wisdom. in late hieroglyphic the name of thoth often has the epithet \"the twice very great,\" sometimes \"the thrice very great\"; in the popular language (demotic) the corresponding epithet is \"the five times very great,\" found as early as the 3rd century b.c. greek translations give [greek: ho megas kai megas] and [greek: megistos: trismegas] occurs in a late magical text. [greek: ho trismegistos] has not yet been found earlier than the 2nd century a.d., but there can now be no doubt of its origin in the above egyptian epithets. thoth was \"the scribe of the gods,\" \"lord of divine words,\" and to hermes was attributed the authorship of all the strictly sacred books generally called by greek authors hermetic. these, according to clemens alexandrinus, our sole ancient authority (_strom._ vi. p. 268 et seq.), were forty-two in number, and were subdivided into six divisions, of which the first, containing ten books, was in charge of the \"prophet\" and dealt with laws, deities and the education of priests; the second, consisting of the ten books of the _stolistes_, the official whose duty it was to dress and ornament the statues of the gods, treated of sacrifices and offerings, prayers, hymns, festive processions; the third, of the \"hierogrammatist,\" also in ten books, was called \"hieroglyphics,\" and was a repertory of cosmographical, geographical and topographical information; the four books of the \"horoscopus\" were devoted to astronomy and astrology; the two books of the \"chanter\" contained respectively a collection of songs in honour of the gods and a description of the royal life and its duties; while the sixth and last division, consisting of the six books of the \"pastophorus,\" was medical. clemens's statement cannot be contradicted. works are extant in papyri and on temple walls, treating of geography, astronomy, ritual, myths, medicine, &c. it is probable that the native priests would have been ready to ascribe the authorship or inspiration, as well as the care and protection of all their books of sacred lore to thoth, although there were a goddess of writing (seshit), and the ancient deified scribes imuthes and amenophis, and later inspired doctors petosiris, nechepso, &c., to be reckoned with; there are indeed some definite traces of such an attribution extant in individual cases. whether a canon of such books was ever established, even in the latest times, may be seriously doubted. we know, however, that the vizier of upper egypt (at thebes) in the eighteenth dynasty, had 40 (not 42) parchment rolls laid before him as he sat in the hall of audience. unfortunately we have no hint of their contents. forty-two was the number of divine assessors at the judgment of the dead before osiris, and was the standard number of the nomes or counties in egypt. the name of hermes seems during the 3rd and following centuries to have been regarded as a convenient pseudonym to place at the head of the numerous syncretistic writings in which it was sought to combine neo-platonic philosophy, philonic judaism and cabalistic theosophy, and so provide the world with some acceptable substitute for the christianity which had even at that time begun to give indications of the ascendancy it was destined afterwards to attain. of these pseudepigraphic hermetic writings some have come down to us in the original greek; others survive in latin or arabic translations; but the majority appear to have perished. that which is best known and has been most frequently edited is the [greek: poimandres] _sive de potestate et sapientia divina_ ([greek: poimandres] being the divine intelligence, [greek: poimen andron]), which consists of fifteen chapters treating of such subjects as the nature of god, the origin of the world, the creation and fall of man, and the divine illumination which is the sole means of his deliverance. the _editio princeps_ appeared in paris in 1554; there is also an edition by g. parthey (1854); the work has also been translated into german by d. tiedemann (1781). other hermetic writings which have been preserved, and which have been for the most part collected by patricius in the _nova de universis philosophia_ (1593), are (in greek) [greek: iatromathematika pros ammona aiguption, peri katakliseos nosounton perignostika, ek tes mathematikes epistemes pros ammona]: (in latin) _aphorismi sive centiloquium, cyranides_; (in arabic, but doubtless from a greek original) an address to the human soul, which has been translated by h. l. fleischer (_an die menschliche seele_, 1870). the connexion of the name of hermes with alchemy will explain what is meant by hermetic sealing, and will account for the use of the phrase \"hermetic medicine\" by paracelsus, as also for the so-called \"hermetic freemasonry\" of the middle ages. besides thoth, anubis (q.v.) was constantly identified with hermes; see also horus. see ursinus, _de zoroastre, hermete_, &c. (nuremberg, 1661); nicolas lenglet-dufresnoy, _l'histoire de la philosophie hermetique_ (paris, 1742); baumgarten-crusius, _de librorum hermeticorum origine atque indole_ (jena, 1827); b. j. hilgers, _de hermetis trismegisti poemandro_ (1855); r. menard, _hermes trismegiste, traduction complete, precedee d'une etude sur l'origine des livres hermetiques_ (1866); r. pietschmann, _hermes trismegistus, nach agyptischen, griechischen, und orientalischen uberlieferungen_ (1875); r. reitzenstein, _poimandres, studien zur griechisch-agyptischen und fruhchristlichen literatur_ (leipzig, 1904); g. r. s. mead, _thrice greatest hermes_ (1907), introduction and translation. (f. ll. g.)",
    "source_url": "https://archive.org/details/EB1911WMF",
    "observed_at": "2026-02-08 18:43:07",
    "integrity": {
        "hash_check": "match",
        "hash_scope": "full_normalized_text",
        "computed_sha256": "4bee2bdc96401c9beec43993d898c024be995c5ee59f55ef994a128cc5660291"
    },
    "machine_use": {
        "read": true,
        "cite": true,
        "decision": "verified_public_domain_text"
    },
    "documentation": {
        "white_paper_url": "https://www.goguides.com/white-paper.php",
        "pdf_url": "https://www.goguides.com/whitepapers/goguides-ai-source-clearance-white-paper.pdf"
    }
}