HARTZENBUSCH

hartzenbusch, juan eugenio (1806-1880), spanish dramatist, was born at madrid on the 6th of september 1806. the son of a german carpenter, he was educated for the priesthood, but he had no religious vocation and, on leaving school, followed his father's trade till 1830, when he learned shorthand and joined the staff of the _gaceta_. his earliest dramatic essays were translations from moliere, voltaire and the elder dumas; he next recast old spanish plays, and in 1837 produced his first original play, _los amantes de teruel_, the subject of which had been used by rey de artieda, tirso de molina and perez de montalban. _los amantes de teruel_ at once made the author's reputation, which was scarcely maintained by _dona mencia_ (1839) and _alfonso el casto_ (1841); it was not till 1845 that he approached his former success with _la jura en santa gadea_. hartzenbusch was chief of the national library from 1862 to 1875, and was an indefatigable--though not very judicious--editor of many national classics. inferior in inspiration to other contemporary spanish dramatists, hartzenbusch excels his rivals in versatility and in conscientious workmanship. harun al-rashid (763 or 766-809), i.e. "harun the orthodox," the fifth of the 'abbasid caliphs of bagdad, and the second son of the third caliph mahdi. his full name was harun ibn muhammad ibn 'abdallah ibn muhammad ibn 'ali ibn 'abdallah ibn 'abbas. he was born at rai (rhagae) on the 20th of march a.d. 763, according to some accounts, and according to others on the 15th of february a.d. 766. harun al-rashid was twenty-two years old when he ascended the throne. his father mahdi just before his death conceived the idea of superseding his elder son musa (afterwards known as hadi, the fourth caliph) by harun. but on mahdi's death harun gave way to his brother. for the campaigns in which he took part prior to his accession see caliphate, section c, _the abbasids_, ss 3 and 4. rashid owed his succession to the throne to the prudence and sagacity of yahya b. khalid the barmecide, his secretary, whom on his accession he appointed his lieutenant and grand vizier (see barmecides). under his guidance the empire flourished on the whole, in spite of several revolts in the provinces by members of the old alid family. successful wars were waged with the rulers of byzantium and the khazars. in 803, however, harun became suspicious of the barmecides, whom with only a single exception he caused to be executed. henceforward the chief power was exercised by fadl b. rabi', who had been chamberlain not only under harun himself but under his predecessors, mansur, madhi and hadi. in the later years of harun's reign troubles arose in the eastern parts of the empire. these troubles assumed proportions so serious that harun himself decided to go to khorasan. he died, however, at tus in march 809. the reign of harun (see caliphate, section c, s 5) was one of the most brilliant in the annals of the caliphate, in spite of losses in north-west africa and transoxiana. his fame spread to the west, and charlemagne and he exchanged gifts and compliments as masters respectively of the west and the east. no caliph ever gathered round him so great a number of learned men, poets, jurists, grammarians, cadis and scribes, to say nothing of the wits and musicians who enjoyed his patronage. harun himself was a scholar and poet, and was well versed in history, tradition and poetry. he possessed taste and discernment, and his dignified demeanour is extolled by the historians. in religion he was extremely strict; he prostrated himself a hundred times daily, and nine or ten times made the pilgrimage to mecca. at the same time he cannot be regarded as a great administrator. he seems to have left everything to his viziers yahya and fadl, to the former of whom especially was due the prosperous condition of the empire. harun is best known to western readers as the hero of many of the stories in the _arabian nights_; and in arabic literature he is the central figure of numberless anecdotes and humorous stories. of his incognito walks through bagdad, however, the authentic histories say nothing. his arabic biographers are unanimous in describing him as noble and generous, but there is little doubt that he was in fact a man of little force of character, suspicious, untrustworthy and on occasions cruel. see the arabic histories of ibn al-athir and ibn khaldun. among modern works see sir w. muir, _the caliphate_ (london, 1891); r. d. osborn, _islam under the khalifs of bagdad_ (london, 1878); gustav weil, _geschichte der chalifen_ (mannheim and stuttgart, 1846-1862); g. le strange, _baghdad during the abbasid caliphate_ (oxford, 1900); a. muller, _der islam_, vol. i. (berlin, 1885); e. h. palmer, _the caliph haroun alraschid_ (london, 1880); j. b. bury's edition of gibbon's _decline and fall_ (london, 1898), vol. vi. pp. 34 foll.