GREEK INDEPENDENCE

greek independence, war of, the name given to the great rising of the greek subjects of the sultan against the ottoman domination, which began in 1821 and ended in 1833 with the establishment of the independent kingdom of greece. the circumstances that led to the insurrection and the general diplomatic situation by which its fortunes were from time to time affected are described elsewhere (see greece: _history_; turkey: _history_). the present article is confined to a description of the general character and main events of the war itself. if we exclude the abortive invasion of the danubian principalities by prince alexander ypsilanti (march 1821), which collapsed ignominiously as soon as it was disavowed by the tsar, the theatre of the war was confined to continental greece, the morea, and the adjacent narrow seas. its history may, broadly speaking, be divided into three periods: the first (1821-1824), during which the greeks, aided by numerous volunteers from europe, were successfully pitted against the sultan's forces alone; the second, from 1824, when the disciplined troops of mehemet ali, pasha of egypt, turned the tide against the insurgents; the third, from the intervention of the european powers in the autumn of 1827 to the end. when, on the 2nd of april 1821, archbishop germanos, head of the _hetaeria_ in the morea, raised the standard of the cross at kalavryta as the signal for a general rising of the christian population, the circumstances were highly favourable. in the morea itself, in spite of plentiful warning, the turks were wholly unprepared; while the bulk of the ottoman army, under the _seraskier_ khurshid pasha, was engaged in the long task of reducing the intrepid ali, pasha of iannina (see ali, pasha of iannina). another factor, and that the determining one, soon came to the aid of the greeks. in warfare carried on in such a country as greece, sea-girt and with a coast deeply indented, inland without roads and intersected with rugged mountains, victory--as wellington was quick to observe--must rest with the side that has command of the sea. this was assured to the insurgents at the outset by the revolt of the maritime communities of the greek archipelago. the greeks of the islands had been accustomed from time immemorial to seafaring; their ships--some as large as frigates--were well armed, to guard against the barbary pirates and rovers of their own kin; lastly, they had furnished the bulk of the sailors to the ottoman navy which, now that this recruiting ground was closed, had to be manned hastily with impressed crews of dock-labourers and peasants, many of whom had never seen the sea. the turkish fleet, "adrift in the archipelago"--as the british seamen put it--though greatly superior in tonnage and weight of metal, could never be a match for the greek brigs, manned as these were by trained, if not disciplined, crews. outbreak of the insurrection. the war was begun by the greeks without definite plan and without any generally recognized leadership. the force with which germanos marched from kalavryta against patras was composed of peasants armed with scythes, clubs and slings, among whom the "primates" exercised a somewhat honorary authority. the town itself was destroyed and those of its mussulman inhabitants who could not escape into the citadel were massacred; but the citadel remained in the hands of the turks till 1828. meanwhile, in the south, leaders of another stamp had appeared: petros, bey of the maina (q.v.) chief of the mavromichales, who at the head of his clan attacked kalamata and put the mussulman inhabitants to the sword; and kolokotrones, a notable brigand once in the service of the ionian government, who--fortified by a vision of the virgin--captured karytaena and slaughtered its infidel population. encouraged by these successes the revolt spread rapidly; within three weeks there was not a mussulman left in the open country, and the remnants of the once dominant class were closely besieged in the fortified towns by hosts of wild peasants and brigands. the flames of revolt now spread across the isthmus of corinth: early in april the christians of dervenokhoria rose, and the whole of boeotia and attica quickly followed suit; at the beginning of may the mussulman inhabitants of athens were blockaded in the acropolis. in the morea, meanwhile, a few mussulman fortresses still held out: coron, modon, navarino, patras, nauplia, monemvasia, tripolitsa. one by one they fell, and everywhere were repeated the same scenes of butchery. the horrors culminated in the capture of tripolitsa, the capital of the vilayet. in september this was taken by storm; kolokotrones rode in triumph to the citadel over streets carpeted with the dead; and the crowning triumph of the cross was celebrated by a cold-blooded massacre of 2000 prisoners of all ages and both sexes. this completed the success of the insurrection in the morea, where only patras, nauplia, and one or two lesser fortresses remained to the turks. meanwhile, north of the isthmus, the fortunes of war had been less one-sided. in the west khurshid's lieutenant, omar vrioni (a mussulman greek of the race of the palaeologi), had inflicted a series of defeats on the insurgents, recaptured levadia, and on the 30th of june relieved the acropolis; but the rout of the troops which mahommed pasha was bringing to his aid by the greeks in the defile of mount oeta, and the news of the fall of tripolitsa, forced him to retreat, and the campaign of 1821 ended with the retirement of the turks into thessaly. the month of april had witnessed the revolt of the principal greek islands, spetsae on the 7th, psara on the 23rd, hydra on the 28th and samos on the 30th. their fleets were divided into squadrons, of which one, under tombazes, was deputed to watch for the entrance of the ottomans into the archipelago, while the other under andreas miaoulis (_q.v._) sailed to blockade patras and watch the coasts of epirus. at sea, as on land, the greeks opened the campaign with hideous atrocities, almost their first exploit being the capture of a vessel carrying to mecca the sheik-ul-islam and his family, whom they murdered with every aggravation of outrage. general character of the war. these inauspicious beginnings, indeed, set the whole tone of the war, which was frankly one of mutual extermination. on both sides the combatants were barbarians, without discipline or competent organization. at sea the greeks rapidly developed into mere pirates, and even miaoulis, for all his high character and courage, was often unable to prevent his captains from sailing home at critical moments, when pay or booty failed. on land the presence of a few educated phanariots, such as demetrios ypsilanti or alexander mavrocordato, was powerless to inspire the rude hordes with any sense of order or of humanity in warfare; while every lull in the fighting, due to a temporary check to the turks, was the signal for internecine conflicts due to the rivalry of leaders who, with rare exceptions, thought more of their personal power and profit than of the cause of greece. turkish reprisals. europe and the rising philhellenism. this cause, indeed, was helped more by the impolitic reprisals of the turks than by the heroism of the insurgents. all europe stood aghast at the news of the execution of the patriarch gregorios of constantinople (april 22, 1821) and the wholesale massacres that followed, culminating as these did in the extermination of the prosperous community of scio (chios) in march 1822. the cause of greece was now that of christendom, of the catholic and protestant west, as of the orthodox east. european liberalism, too, gagged and fettered under metternich's "system," recognized in the greeks the champions of its own cause; while even conservative statesmen, schooled in the memories of ancient hellas, saw in the struggle a fight of civilization against barbarism. this latter belief, which was, moreover, flattering to their vanity, the greek leaders were astute enough to foster; the propaganda of adamantios coraes (_q.v._) had done its work; and wily brigands, like odysseus of ithaka, assuming the style and trappings of antiquity, posed as the champions of classic culture against the barbarian. all europe, then, hailed with joy the exploit of constantine kanaris, who on the night of june 18-19 succeeded in steering a fire-ship among the turkish squadron off scio, and burned the flag-ship of the capudan-pasha with 3000 souls on board. expedition of dramali, 1822. meanwhile sultan mahmud, now wide awake to the danger, had been preparing for a systematic effort to suppress the rising. the threatened breach with russia had been avoided by metternich's influence on the tsar alexander; the death of ali of iannina had set free the army of khurshid pasha, who now, as _seraskier_ of rumelia, was charged with the task of reducing the morea. in the spring of 1822 two turkish armies advanced southwards: one, under omar vrioni, along the coast of western hellas, the other, under ali, pasha of drama (dramali), through boeotia and attica. omar was held in check by the mud ramparts of missolonghi; but dramali, after exacting fearful vengeance for the massacre of the turkish garrison of the acropolis at athens, crossed the isthmus and with the over-confidence of a conquering barbarian advanced to the relief of the hard-pressed garrison of nauplia. he crossed the perilous defile of dervenaki unopposed; and at the news of his approach most of the members of the greek government assembled at argos fled in panic terror. demetrios ypsilanti, however, with a few hundred men joined the mainote karayanni in the castle of larissa, which crowns the acropolis of ancient argos. this held dramali in check, and gave kolokotrones time to collect an army. the turks, in the absence of the fleet which was to have brought them supplies, were forced to retreat (august 6); the greeks, inspired with new courage, awaited them in the pass of dervenaki, where the undisciplined ottoman host, thrown into confusion by an avalanche of boulders hurled upon them, was annihilated. in western greece the campaign had an outcome scarcely less disastrous for the turks. the death of ali of iannina had been followed by the suppression of the insurgent suliotes and the advance of omar vrioni southwards to missolonghi; but the town held out gallantly, a turkish surprise attack, on the 6th of january 1823, was beaten off, and omar vrioni had to abandon the siege and retire northwards over the pass of makrynoros. civil war among the greeks. campaign of 1823. the victorious outcome of the year's fighting had a disastrous effect upon the greeks. their victories had been due mainly to the guerilla tactics of the leaders of the type of kolokotrones; mavrocordato, whose character and antecedents had marked him out as the natural head of the new greek state, in spite of his successful defence of missolonghi, had been discredited by failures elsewhere; and the greeks thus learned to despise their civilized advisers and to underrate the importance of discipline. the temporary removal of the common peril, moreover, let loose all the sectional and personal jealousies, which even in face of the enemy had been with difficulty restrained, and the year 1823 witnessed the first civil war between the greek parties. these internecine feuds might easily have proved fatal to the cause of greece. in the archipelago hydriotes and spetsiotes were at daggers drawn; the men of psara were at open war with those of samos; all semblance of discipline and cohesion had vanished from the greek fleet. had khosrev, the new ottoman admiral, been a man of enterprise, he might have regained the command of the sea and, with it, that of the whole situation. but the fate of his predecessor had filled him with a lively terror of kanaris and his fire-ships; he contented himself with a cruise round the coasts of greece, and was happy to return to safety under the guns of the dardanelles without having accomplished anything beyond throwing supplies and troops into coron, modon and patras. on land, meanwhile, the events of the year before practically repeated themselves. in the west an army of mussulman and catholic albanians, under mustai pasha, advanced southwards. on the night of the 21st of august occurred the celebrated exploit of marko botzaris and his suliotes: a successful surprise attack on the camp of the ottoman vanguard, in which the suliote leader fell. the jealousy of the aetolian militia for the suliotes, however, prevented the victory being decisive; and mustai advanced to the siege of anatoliko, a little town in the lagoons near missolonghi. here he was detained until, on the 11th of december, he was forced to raise the siege and retire northwards. his colleague, yussuf pasha, in east hellas fared no better; here, too, the turks gained some initial successes, but in the end the harassing tactics of kolokotrones and his guerilla bands forced them back into the plain of the kephissos. at the end of the year the greeks were once more free to renew their internecine feuds. just when these feuds were at their height, in the autumn of 1823, the most famous of the philhellenes who sacrificed themselves for the cause of greece, lord byron, arrived in greece. second civil war, 1824. intervention of mehemet ali. the year 1824 was destined to be a fateful one for the greek cause. the large loans raised in europe, the first instalment of which byron had himself brought over, while providing the greeks with the sinews of war, provided them also with fresh material for strife. to the struggle for power was added a struggle for a share of this booty, and a second civil war broke out, kolokotrones leading the attack on the forces of the government. early in 1825 the government was victorious; kolokotrones was in prison; and odysseus, the hero of so many exploits and so many crimes, who had ended by turning traitor and selling his services to the turks, had been captured, imprisoned in the acropolis, and finally assassinated by his former lieutenant gouras (july 16, 1824). but a new and more terrible danger now threatened greece. sultan mahmud, despairing of suppressing the insurrection by his own power, had reluctantly summoned to his aid mehemet ali, pasha of egypt, whose well-equipped fleet and disciplined army were now thrown into the scale against the greeks. already, in june 1823, the pasha's son-in-law hussein bey had landed in crete, and by april of the following year had reduced the insurgent islanders to submission. crete now became the base of operations against the greeks. on the 19th of june hussein appeared before kasos, a nest of pirates of evil reputation, which he captured and destroyed. the same day the egyptian fleet, under ibrahim pasha, sailed from alexandria. khosrev, too, emboldened by this new sense of support, ventured to sea, surprised and destroyed psara (july 2), and planned an attack on samos, which was defeated by miaoulis and his fire-ships (august 16, 17). on the 1st of september, however, khosrev succeeded in effecting a junction with ibrahim off budrun, and two indecisive engagements followed with the united greek fleet on the 5th and 10th. the object of ibrahim was to reach suda bay with his transports, which the greeks should at all costs have prevented. a first attempt was defeated by miaoulis on the 16th of november, and ibrahim was compelled to retire and anchor off rhodes; but the greek admiral was unable to keep his fleet together, the season was far advanced, his captains were clamouring for arrears of pay, and the greek fleet sailed for nauplia, leaving the sea unguarded. on the 5th of december ibrahim again set sail, and reached suda without striking a blow. here he completed his preparations, and, on the 24th of february 1825, landed at modon in the morea with a force of 4000 regular infantry and 500 cavalry. the rest followed, without the greeks making any effort to intercept them. ibrahim in the morea. the conditions of the war were now completely changed. the greeks, who had been squandering the money provided by the loans in every sort of senseless extravagance, affected to despise the egyptian invaders, but they were soon undeceived. on the 21st of march ibrahim had laid siege to navarino, and after some delay a greek force under skourti, a hydriote sea-captain, was sent to its relief. the greeks had in all some 7000 men, suliotes, albanians, _armatoli_ from rumelia, and some irregular bulgarian and vlach cavalry. on the 19th of april they were met by ibrahim at krommydi with 2000 regular infantry, 400 cavalry and four guns. the greek entrenchments were stormed at the point of the bayonet by ibrahim's fellahin at the first onset; the defenders broke and fled, leaving 600 dead on the field. the news of this disaster, and of the fall of pylos and navarino that followed, struck terror into the greek government; and in answer to popular clamour kolokotrones was taken from prison and placed at the head of the army. but the guerilla tactics of the wily klepht were powerless against ibrahim, who marched northward, and, avoiding nauplia for the present, seized tripolitsa, and made this the base from which his columns marched to devastate the country far and wide. reshid "kutahia" besieges missolonghi. meanwhile from the north the ottomans were making another supreme effort. the command of the army that was to operate in west hellas had been given to reshid "kutahia," pasha of iannina, an able general and a man of determined character. on the 6th of april, after bribing the albanian clansmen to neutrality, he passed the defile of makrynoros, which the greeks had left undefended, and on the 7th of may opened the second siege of missolonghi. for twelve months the population held out, repulsing the attacks of the enemy, refusing every offer of honourable capitulation. this resistance was rendered possible by the greek command of the sea, miaoulis from time to time entering the lagoons with supplies; it came to an end when this command was lost. in september 1825 ibrahim, at the order of the sultan, had joined reshid before the town; piecemeal the outlying forts and defences now fell, until the garrison, reduced by starvation and disease, determined to hazard all on a final sortie. this took place on the night of the 22nd of april 1826; but a mistaken order threw the ranks of the greeks into disorder, and the turks entered the town pell-mell with the retreating crowd. only a remnant of the defenders succeeded in gaining the forests of mount zygos, where most of them perished. karaiskakis. the fall of missolonghi, followed as this was by the submission of many of the more notable chiefs, left reshid free to turn his attention to east hellas, where gouras had been ruling as a practically independent chief and in the spirit of a brigand. the peasants of the open country welcomed the turks as deliverers, and reshid's conciliatory policy facilitated his march to athens, which fell at the first assault on the 25th of august, siege being at once laid to the acropolis, where gouras and his troops had taken refuge. round this the war now centred; for all recognized that its fall would involve that of the cause of greece. in these straits the greek government entrusted the supreme command of the troops to karaiskakis, an old retainer of ali of iannina, a master of the art of guerilla war, and, above all, a man of dauntless courage and devoted patriotism. a first attempt to relieve the acropolis, with the assistance of some disciplined troops under the french colonel fabvier, was defeated at chaidari by the turks. the garrison of the acropolis was hard pressed, and the death of gouras (october 13th) would have ended all, had not his heroic wife taken over the command and inspired the defenders with new courage. for months the siege dragged on, while karaiskakis fought with varying success in the mountains, a final victory at distomo (february 1827) over omar vrioni securing the restoration to the greek cause of all continental greece, except the towns actually held by the turks. cochrane and church. greek defeat at athens. it was at this juncture that the greek government, reinforced by a fresh loan from europe, handed over the chief command at sea to lord cochrane (earl of dundonald, _q.v._), and that of the land forces to general (afterwards sir richard) church, both miaoulis and karaiskakis consenting without demur to serve under them. cochrane and church at once concentrated their energies on the task of relieving the acropolis. already, on the 5th of february, general gordon had landed and entrenched himself on the hill of munychia, near the ancient piraeus, and the efforts of the turks to dislodge him had failed, mainly owing to the fire of the steamer "karteria" commanded by captain hastings. when church and cochrane arrived, a general assault on the ottoman camp was decided on. this was preceded, on the 25th of april, by an attack, headed by cochrane, on the turkish troops established near the monastery of st spiridion, the result of which was to establish communications between the greeks at munychia and phalerum and isolate reshid's vanguard on the promontory of the piraeus. the monastery held out for two days longer, when the albanian garrison surrendered on terms, but were massacred by the greeks as they were marching away under escort. for this miserable crime church has, by some historians, been held responsible by default; it is clear, however, from his own account that no blame rests upon him (see his ms. _narrative_, vol. i. chap. ii. p. 34). the assault on the turkish main camp was fixed for the 6th of may; but, unfortunately, a chance skirmish brought on an engagement the day before, in the course of which karaiskakis was killed, an irreparable loss in view of his prestige with the wild _armatoli_. the assault on the following day was a disastrous failure. the greeks, advancing prematurely over broken ground and in no sort of order, were fallen upon in flank by reshid's horsemen, and fled in panic terror. the english officers, who in vain tried to rally them, themselves only just escaped by scrambling into their boats and putting off to the war-vessels, whose guns checked the pursuit and enabled a remnant of the fugitives to escape. church held munychia till the 27th, when he sent instructions for the garrison of the acropolis to surrender. on the 5th of june the remnant of the defenders marched out with the honours of war, and continental greece was once more in the power of the turks. had reshid at once advanced over the isthmus, the morea also must have been subdued; but he was jealous of ibrahim, and preferred to return to iannina to consolidate his conquests. renewed anarchy. the fate of greece was now in the hands of the powers, who after years of diplomatic wrangling had at last realized that intervention was necessary if greece was to be saved for european civilization. the worst enemy of the greeks was their own incurable spirit of faction; in the very crisis of their fate, during the siege of missolonghi, rival presidents and rival assemblies struggled for supremacy, and a third civil war had only been prevented by the arrival of cochrane and church. under their influence a new national assembly met at troezene in march 1827 and elected as president count capo d'istria (_q.v._), formerly russian minister for foreign affairs; at the same time a new constitution was promulgated which, when the very life of the insurrection seemed on the point of flickering out, set forth the full ideal of pan-hellenic dreams. anarchy followed; war of rumeliotes against moreotes, of chief against chief; rival factions bombarded each other from the two forts at nauplia over the stricken town, and in derision of the impotent government. finally, after months of inaction, ibrahim began once more his systematic devastation of the country. to put a stop to this the powers decided to intervene by means of a joint demonstration of their fleets, in order to enforce an armistice and compel ibrahim to evacuate the morea (treaty of london, july 6, 1827). the refusal of ibrahim to obey, without special instruction from the sultan, led to the entrance of the allied british, french and russian fleet into the harbour of navarino and the battle of the 20th of october 1827 (see navarino). this, and the two campaigns of the russo-turkish war of 1828-29, decided the issue. authorities.--there is no trustworthy history of the war, based on all the material now available, and all the existing works must be read with caution, especially those by eye-witnesses, who were too often prejudiced or the dupes of the greek factions. the best-known works are: g. finlay, _hist. of the greek revolution_ (2 vols., london, 1861); t. gordon, _hist. of the greek revolution_ (london, 1833); c. w. p. mendelssohn-bartholdy, _geschichte griechenlands_, &c. (_staatengeschichte der neuesten zeit_) (2 vols., leipzig, 1870-1874); f. c. h. l. pouqueville, _histoire de la regeneration de la grece, &c._ (4 vols., paris, 1824),--the author was french resident at the court of ali of iannina and afterwards consul at patras; count a. prokesch-osten, _geschichte des abfalls der griechen vom turkischen reich, &c._ (6 vols., vienna, 1867), the last four volumes consisting of _pieces justificatives_ of much value. see also w. alison phillips, _the war of greek independence_ (london and new york, 1897), a sketch compiled mainly from the above-mentioned works: spiridionos tricoupi, [greek: historia tes hellenikes epanastaseos] (athens, 1853); j. philemon, [greek: dokimion historikon peri tes hellenikes epanastaseos] (athens, 1859), in four parts: (1) history of the hetaeria philike, (2) the heralding of the war and the rising under ypsilanti, (3 and 4). the insurrection in greece to 1822, with many documents. of great value also are the 29 volumes of correspondence and papers of sir richard church, now in the british museum (add mss. 36,543-36,571). among these is a narrative by church of the war in greece during his tenure of the command (vols. xxi.-xxiii., nos. 36,563-36,565), which contains the material for correcting many errors repeated in most works on the war, notably the strictures of finlay and others on church's conduct before athens. for further references see the bibliography appended to w. alison phillips's chapter on "greece and the balkan peninsula" in the _cambridge modern history_, x. 803. (w. a. p.) greek language. greek is one of the eight main branches into which the indo-european languages (q.v.) are divided. the area in which it is spoken has been curiously constant throughout its recorded history. these limits are, roughly speaking, the shores of the aegean, on both the european and the asiatic side, and the intermediate islands (one of the most archaic of greek dialects being found on the eastern side in the island of cyprus), and the greek peninsula generally from its southern promontories as far as the mountains which shut in thessaly on the north. beyond mt. olympus and the cambunian mountains lay macedonia, in which a closely kindred dialect was spoken, so closely related, indeed, that o. hoffmann has argued (_die makedonen_, gottingen, 1906) that macedonian is not only greek, but a part of the great aeolic dialect which included thessalian to the south and lesbian to the east. in the north-west, greek included many rude dialects little known even to the ancient greeks themselves, and it extended northwards beyond aetolia and ambracia to southern epirus and thesprotia. in the homeric age the great shrine of pelasgian zeus was at dodona, but, by the time of thucydides, aetolia and all north of it had come to be looked upon as the most backward of greek lands, where men lived a savage life, speaking an almost unintelligible language, and eating raw flesh ([greek: agnostotatoi de glossan kai omophagoi], thuc. iii. 94, of the aetolian eurytanes). the greeks themselves had no memory of how they came to occupy this land. their earliest legends connected the origin of their race with thessaly and mt. pindus, but athenians and arcadians also boasted themselves of autochthonous race, inhabiting a country wherein no man had preceded their ancestors. the greek language, at any rate as it has come down to us, is remarkably perfect, in vowel sounds being the most primitive of any of the indo-european languages, while its verb system has no rival in completeness except in the earliest sanskrit of the vedic literature. its noun system, on the other hand, is much less complete, its cases being more broken down than those of the aryan, armenian, slavonic and italic families. the most remarkable characteristic of greek is one conditioned by the geographical aspect of the land. few countries are so broken up with mountains as greece. not only do mountain ranges as elsewhere on the european continent run east and west, but other ranges cross them from north to south, thus dividing the portions of greece at some distance from the sea into hollows without outlet, every valley being separated for a considerable part of the year from contact with every other, and inter-communication at all seasons being rendered difficult. thus till external coercion from macedon came into play it was never possible to establish a great central government controlling the greek mainland. the geographical situation of the islands in the aegean equally led to the isolation of one little territory from another. to these geographical considerations may be added the inveterate desire of the greeks to make the [greek: polis], the city state, everywhere and at all times an independent unit, a desire which, originating in the geographical conditions, even accentuated the isolating effect of the natural features of the country. thus at one time in the little island of amorgos there were no less than three separate and independent political units. the inevitable result of geographical and political division was the maintenance of a great number of local characteristics in language, differentiating in this respect also each political community from its nearest neighbours. it was only natural that the inhabitants of a country so little adapted to maintain a numerous population should have early sent off swarms to other lands. the earliest stage of colonization lies in the borderland between myth and history. the greeks themselves knew that a population had preceded them in the islands of the cyclades which they identified with the carians of asia minor (herodotus i. 171; thucydides i. 4. 8). the same population indeed appears to have preceded them on the mainland of greece, for there are similar place-names in caria and in greece which have no etymology in greek. thus the endings of words like parnassus and halicarnassus seem identical, and the common ending of place-names in -[greek: inthos, korinthos, probalinthos], &c., seems to be the same in origin with the common ending of asiatic names in -_nda_, alinda, karyanda, &c. probably the earliest portion of asia minor to be colonized by the greeks was the north-west, to which came settlers from thessaly, when the early inhabitants were driven out by the thesprotians, who later controlled thessaly. the name aeolis, which after times gave to the n.w. of asia minor, was the old name for thessaly (hdt. vii. 176). these thesprotians were of the same stock as the dorians, to whose invasion of the peloponnese the later migration, which carried the ionians to asia and the cypriot greeks to cyprus, in all probability was due. from the north aegean probably the dorians reached crete, where alone their existence is recorded by homer (_odyssey_, xix. 175 ff.; diodorus siculus v. 80. 2); cp. fick, _vorgriechische ortsnamen_ (1906). among the greeks of the pre-dorian period herodotus distinguishes various stocks. though the name is not homeric, both herodotus and thucydides recognize an aeolian stock which must have spread over thessaly and far to the west till it was suppressed and absorbed by the dorian stock which came in from the north-west. the name of aeolis still attached in thucydides' time to the western area of calydon between the mountains and the n. side of the entrance to the corinthian gulf (iii. 102). in boeotia the same stock survived (thuc. vii. 57. 5), overlaid by an influx of dorians, and it came down to the isthmus; for the corinthians, though speaking in historical times a doric dialect, were originally aeolians (thuc. iv. 42). in the peloponnese herodotus recognizes (viii. 73) three original stocks, the arcadians, the ionians of cynuria, and the achaeans. in arcadia there is little doubt that the pre-dorian population maintained itself and its language, just as in the mountains of wales, the scottish highlands and connemara the celtic language has maintained itself against the saxon invaders. by herodotus' time the cynurians had been doricized, while the ionians, along the south side of the corinthian gulf, were expelled by the achaeans (vii. 94, viii. 73), apparently themselves driven from their own homes by the dorian invasion (strabo viii. p. 333 _fin_.). however this may be, the achaeans of historical times spoke a dialect akin to that of northern elis and of the greeks on the north side of the corinthian gulf. how close the relation may have been between the language of the achaeans of the peloponnese in the homeric age and their contemporaries in thessaly we have no means of ascertaining definitely, the documentary evidence for the history of the dialects being all very much later than homeric times. even in the homeric catalogue agamemnon has to lend the arcadians ships to take them to troy (_iliad_, ii. 612). but a population speaking the same or a very similar dialect was probably seated on the eastern coast, and migrated at the beginning of the doric invasion to cyprus. as this population wrote not in the greek alphabet but in a peculiar syllabary and held little communication with the rest of the greek world, it succeeded in preserving in cyprus a very archaic dialect very closely akin to that of arcadia, and also containing a considerable number of words found in the homeric vocabulary but lost or modified in later greek elsewhere. on this historical foundation alone is it possible to understand clearly the relation of the dialects in historical times. the prehistoric movements of the greek tribes can to some extent be realized in their dialects, as recorded in their inscriptions, though all existing inscriptions belong to a much later period. thus from the ancient aeolis of northern greece sprang the historical dialects of thessaly and lesbos with the neighbouring coast of asia minor. at an early period the dorians had invaded and to some extent affected the character of the southern thessalian and to a much greater extent that of the boeotian dialect. the dialects of locris, phocis and aetolia were a somewhat uncouth and unliterary form of doric. according to accepted tradition, elis had been colonized by oxylus the aetolian, and the dialect of the more northerly part of elis, as already pointed out, is, along with the achaean of the south side of the corinthian gulf, closely akin to those dialects north of the isthmus. the most southerly part of elis--triphylia--has a dialect akin to arcadian. apart from arcadian the other dialects of the peloponnese in historical times are all doric, though in small details they differ among themselves. though we are unable to check the statements of the historians as to the area occupied by ionic in prehistoric times, it is clear from the legends of the close connexion between athens and troezen that the same dialect, had been spoken on both sides of the saronic gulf, and may well have extended, as herodotus says, along the eastern coast of the peloponnese and the south side of the corinthian gulf. according to legend, the ionians expelled from the peloponnese collected at athens before they started on their migrations to the coast of asia minor. be that as it may, legend and language alike connected the athenians with the ionians, though by the 5th century b.c. the athenians no longer cared to be known by the name (hdt. i. 143). lemnos, imbros and scyros, which had long belonged to athens, were athenian also in language. the great island of euboea and all the islands of the central aegean between greece and asia were ionic. chios, the most northerly ionic island on the asiatic coast, seems to have been originally aeolic, and its ionic retained some aeolic characteristics. the most southerly of the mainland towns which were originally aeolic was smyrna, but this at an early date became ionic (hdt. i. 149). the last important ionic town to the south was miletus, but at an early period ionic widened its area towards the south also and took in halicarnassus from the dorians. according to herodotus, there were four kinds of ionic ([greek: charakteres glosses tesseres], i. 142). herodotus tells us the areas in which these dialects were spoken, but nothing of the differences between them. they were (1) samos, (2) chios and erythrae, (3) the towns in lydia, (4) the towns in caria. the language of the inscriptions unfortunately is a [greek: koine], a conventional literary language which reveals no differences of importance. only recently has the characteristic so well known in herodotus of [kappa] appearing in certain words where other dialects have [pi] ([greek: hokos] for [greek: hopos, kou] for [greek: pou], &c.) been found in any inscription. it is, however, clear that this was a popular characteristic not considered to be sufficiently dignified for official documents. we may conjecture that the native languages spoken on the lydian and carian coasts had affected the character of the language spoken by the greek immigrants, more especially as the settlers from athens married carian women, while the settlers in the other towns were a mixture of greek tribes, many of them not ionic at all (hdt. i. 146). the more southerly islands of the aegean and the most southerly peninsula of asia minor were doric. in the homeric age dorians were only one of many peoples in crete, but in historical times, though the dialects of the eastern and the western ends of the island differ from one another and from the middle whence our most valuable documents come, all are doric. by melos and thera dorians carried their language to cos, calymnus, cnidus and rhodes. these settlements, aeolic, ionic and doric, grew and prospered, and like flourishing hives themselves sent out fresh swarms to other lands. most prosperous and energetic of all was miletus, which established its trading posts in the black sea to the north and in the delta of the nile (naucratis) to the south. the islands also sent off their colonies, carrying their dialects with them, paros to thasos, euboea to the peninsulas of chalcidice; the dorians of megara guarded the entrance to the black sea at chalcedon and byzantium. while achaean influence spread out to the more southerly ionian islands, corinth carried her dialect with her colonies to the coast of acarnania, leucas and corcyra. but the greatest of all corinthian colonies was much farther to the west--at syracuse in sicily. unfortunately the continuous occupation of the same or adjacent sites has led to the loss of almost all that is early from corinth and from syracuse. corcyra has bequeathed to us some interesting grave inscriptions from the 6th century b.c. southern italy and sicily were early colonized by greeks. according to tradition cumae was founded not long after the trojan war; even if we bring the date nearer the founding of syracuse in 735 b.c., we have apparently no record earlier than the first half of the 5th century b.c., though it is still the earliest of chalcidian inscriptions. tarentum was a laconian foundation, but the longest and most important document from a laconian colony in italy comes from heraclea about the end of the 4th century b.c.--the report of a commission upon and the lease of temple lands with description and conditions almost of modern precision. to achaea belonged the south italian towns of croton, metapontum and sybaris. the ancestry of the greek towns of sicily has been explained by thucydides (vi. 2-5). selinus, a colony of megara, betrays its origin in its dialect. gela and agrigentum no less clearly show their descent from rhodes. according to tradition the great city of cyrene in africa was founded from thera, itself an offshoot from sparta. chief characteristics of the greek dialects 1. _arcadian and cyprian._--as cyprian was written in a syllabary which could not represent a consonant by itself, did not distinguish between voiced, unvoiced and aspirated consonants, did not represent at all a nasal before another consonant, and did not distinguish between long and short vowels, the interpretation of the symbols is of the nature of a conundrum and the answer is not always certain. thus the same combination of two symbols would have to stand for [greek: tote, tode, dote, dothe, tonde, tode, to, de]. no inscription of more than a few words in length is found in either dialect earlier than the 5th century b.c. in both dialects the number of important inscriptions is steadily increasing. both dialects change final [omicron] to [upsilon], [greek: apo] passing into [greek: apy]. arcadian changes the verb ending -[greek: ai] into -[greek: oi]. arcadian uses [delta] or [zeta] for an original _gw_-sound, which appears in attic greek as [beta]: [greek: zello], attic [greek: ballo], "throw." in inflexion both agree in changing -[greek: ao] of masculine -[alpha] stems into [greek: au] (arcadian carries this form also into the feminine -[alpha] stems), and in using locatives in -[greek: ai] and -[greek: oi] for the dative, such locatives being governed by the prepositions [greek: apy] and [greek: ex] (before a consonant [greek: es] in arcadian). verbs in -[greek: ao], -[greek: eo] and -[greek: oo] are declined not as -[omega], but as -[greek: mi] verbs. the final [iota] of the ending of the 3rd plural present changes the preceding [tau] to [sigma]: [greek: pheronsi], cp. laconian (doric) [greek: pheronti], attic [greek: pherousi], lesbian [greek: pheroisi]. instead of the attic [greek: tis], the interrogative pronoun appears as [greek: sis], the initial [sigma] in arcadian being written with a special symbol [koppa]. the pronunciation is not certain. the original sound was _qw_, as in latin _quis_, whence attic [greek: tis] and thessalian [greek: kis]. in arcadian [greek: kan] the aeolic particle [greek: ke] and the ionic [greek: an] seem to be combined. 2. _aeolic._--though boeotian is overlaid with a doric element, it nevertheless agrees with thessalian and lesbian in some characteristics. unlike greek generally, they represent the original _qw_ of the word for _four_ by [pi] before [epsilon], where attic and other dialects have [tau]: [greek: pettares], attic [greek: tettares]. the corresponding voiced and aspirated sounds are similarly treated: [greek: belphaios] the adjective in thessalian to [greek: delphoi], and [greek: pher] for [greek: ther]. they all tend to change [omicron] to [upsilon]: [greek: onyma], "name"; [greek: ou] for [omega] in thessalian: [greek: aploun], "apollo"; and [upsilon] in boeotian for [greek: oi]: [greek: wukia] ([greek: oikia]), "house." they also make the dative plural of the third declension in -[greek: essi], and the perfect participle active is declined like a present participle in -[greek: on]. instead of the athenian method of giving the father's name in the genitive when a citizen is described, these dialects (especially thessalian) tend to make an adjective: thus instead of the attic [greek: demosthenes demosthenous], aeolic would rather have [greek: d. demostheneios]. thessalian stands midway between lesbian and boeotian, agreeing with lesbian in the use of double consonants, where attic has a single consonant, with or without lengthening of the previous syllable: [greek: emmi], attic [greek: eimi] for an original *_esmi_; [greek: stalla], attic [greek: stele]; [greek: xennos] for an earlier [greek: xenwos], attic [greek: xenos], ionic [greek: xeinos], doric [greek: xenos]. where attic has -[greek: as] from an earlier -[greek: ans] or -[greek: ants], lesbian has -[greek: ais]: [greek: tais archais] accusative in lesbian for older [greek: tans archans]. lesbian has no oxyton words according to the grammarians, the accent being carried back to the penult or ante-*penultimate syllable. it has also no "rough breathing," but this characteristic it shared with the ionic of asia minor, and in the course of time with other dialects. the characteristic particle of the dialects is [greek: ke], which is used like the doric [greek: ka], the arcadian [greek: kan], and the attic and ionic [greek: an]. thessalian and lesbian agree in making their long vowels close, [eta] belonging [greek: ei] (a close _e_, not a diphthong), [greek: pateir], "father." the [upsilon] sound did not become _u_ as in attic and ionic, and hence when the ionic alphabet was introduced it was spelt [greek: ou], or when in contact with dentals [greek: iou], as in [greek: oniouma = onyma], "name," [greek: tioucha = tyche], "chance"; the pronunciation, therefore, must have been like the english sound in _news_, _tune_. boeotian developed earlier than other dialects the changes in the vowels which characterize modern greek: [greek: ai] became _e_, [greek: kai] passing into [greek: ke]: compare [greek: pateir] and [greek: wukia] above: [greek: ei] became [iota] in [greek: echi], "has." thessalian shows some examples of the homeric genitive in -[greek: oio: polemoio], &c.; its ordinary genitive of [omicron]- stems is in -[greek: oi]. there are some points of connexion between this group and arcadian-cyprian: in both thessalian and cyprian the characteristic [greek: ptolis] (attic, &c., [greek: polis]) and [greek: dauchna]- for [greek: daphne] are found, and both groups form the "contracting verbs" not in -[omega] but in -[greek: mi]. in the second group as in the first there is little that precedes the 5th century b.c. future additions to our materials may be expected to lessen the gap between the two groups and homer. 3. _ionic-attic._--one of the earliest of greek inscriptions--of the 7th century, at least--is the attic inscription written in two lines from right to left upon a wine goblet ([greek: oinochoe]) given as a prize: [greek: hos nun orcheston panton | atalotata paizei toto dekan min]. the last words are uncertain. till lately early inscriptions in ionic were few, but recently an early inscription has been found at ephesus and a later copy of a long early inscription at miletus. the most noticeable characteristic of attic and ionic is the change of [alpha] into [eta] which is universal in ionic but does not appear in attic after another vowel or [rho]. thus both dialects used [greek: meter, time] from an earlier [greek: mater, tima], but attic had [greek: sophia, pragma] and [greek: chora], not [greek: sophie, pregma] and [greek: chore] as in ionic. the apparent exception [greek: kore] is explained by the fact that in this word a digamma [digamma] has been lost after [rho], in doric [greek: korwa]. that the change took place after the ionians came into asia is shown by the word [greek: medoi], which in cyprian is [greek: madoi]; the medes were certainly not known to the greeks till long after the conquest of ionia. while aeolic and the greater part of doric kept [digamma], this symbol and the sound _w_ represented by it had disappeared from both ionic and attic before existing records begin--in other words, were certainly not in use after 800 b.c. the symbol was known and occurs in a few isolated instances. both dialects agreed in changing _u_ into _u_, so that a _u_ sound has to be represented by [greek: ou]. the short _o_ tended towards _u_, so that the contraction of [omicron] + [omicron] gave [greek: ou]. in the same way short _e_ tended towards _i_, so that the contraction of [epsilon] + [epsilon] gave [greek: ei], which was not a diphthong but a close _e_-sound. in attic greek these contractions were represented by o and e respectively till the official adoption of the ionic alphabet at athens in 403 b.c. so also were the lengthened syllables which represent in their length the loss of an earlier consonant, as [greek: emeina] and [greek: eneima], aeolic [greek: emenna, enemma], which stand for a prehistoric *[greek: emensa] and *[greek: enemsa], containing the -[sigma]- of the first aorist, and [greek: tous, oikous, echousi] representing an earlier [greek: tons, oikons, echonti] (3 pl. present) or *[greek: echontsi] (dative pl. of present participle). both dialects also agreed in changing [tau] before [iota] into [sigma] (like aeolic), as in [greek: echousi] above, and in the 3rd person singular of -[greek: mi] verbs, [greek: tithesi, didosi], &c., and in noun stems, as in [greek: dosis] for an earlier *[greek: dotis]. neither dialect used the particle [greek: ke] or [greek: ka], but both have [greek: an] instead. one of the effects of the change of [alpha] into [eta] was that the combination [greek: ao] changed in both dialects to [greek: eo], which in all attic records and in the later ionic has become [greek: eo] by a metathesis in the quantity of the vowels: [greek: naos], earlier [greek: nawos], "temple," is in homeric greek [greek: neos], in later ionic and attic [greek: neos]. in the dative (locative) plural of the -[alpha] stems, ionic has generally -[greek: eisi] on the analogy of the singular; attic had first the old locative form in -[greek: esi], -[greek: asi], which survived in forms which became adverbs like [greek: athenesi] and [greek: thurasi]; but after 420 b.c. these were replaced by -[greek: ais, thurais], &c. the ionic of asia minor showed many changes earlier than that of the cyclades and euboea. it lost the aspirate very early: hence in the ionic alphabet h is _e_, not _h_; it changed [greek: au] and [greek: eu] into [greek: ao] and [greek: eo], and very early replaced to a large extent the -[greek: mi] by the -[omega] verbs. this confusion can be seen in progress in the attic literature of the 5th and 4th centuries b.c., [greek: deiknymi] gradually giving way to [greek: deiknyo], while the literature generally uses forms like [greek: ephiei] for [greek: ephie] (impft.). in attica also the aspiration which survived in the ionic of euboea and the cyclades ceased by the end of the 5th century. the ionic of asia minor has -[greek: ios] as the genitive of _o_-stems; the other forms of ionic have -[greek: idos]. 4. _doric._--as already mentioned, the dialects of the north-west differ in several respects from doric elsewhere. as general characteristics of doric may be noted the contractions of [alpha] + [epsilon] into [eta], and of [alpha] + [omicron] or [omega] into [alpha], while the results in attic and ionic of these contractions are [alpha] and [omega] respectively: [greek: enike] from [greek: nikao], attic [greek: enika; timames] 1 pl. pres. from [greek: timao], attic [greek: timomen; timan] gen. pl. of [greek: tima] "honour," attic [greek: timon]. in inflection the most noticeable points are the pronominal adverbs in locative form: [greek: toutei, tenei] (this from a stem limited to a few doric dialects and the bucolic poets), [greek: teide, hopei], &c.; the nom. pl. of the article [greek: toi, tai], not [greek: hoi, hai] and so [greek: toutoi] in selinus and rhodes; the 1st pl. of the verb in -[greek: mes], not in -[greek: men], cp. the latin -_mus_; the aorist and future in -[xi]-, where other dialects have -[sigma]-, or contraction from presents in-[greek: zo]; dikazo, dikaso], doric [greek: dikaxo], &c.; the future passive with active endings, [greek: epimeletheseunti] (rhodes), found as yet only in the doric islands and in the doric prose of archimedes; the particles [greek: ai] "if" and [greek: ka] with a similar value to the aeolic [greek: ke] and the attic-ionic [greek: an]. doric had an accentuation system different both from aeolic and from ionic-attic, but the details of the system are very imperfectly known. in older works doric is often divided into a _dialectus severior_ and a _dialectus mitis_. but the difference is one of time rather than of place, the peculiarities of doric being gradually softened down till it was ultimately merged in the _lingua franca_, the [greek: koine], which in time engulfed all the local dialects except the descendant of spartan, tzakonian. here it is possible to mention its varieties only in the briefest form. (a) the southern dialects are well illustrated in the inscriptions of laconia recently much increased in number by the excavations of the british school at athens. apart from some brief dedications, the earliest inscription of importance is the list of names placed on a bronze column soon after 479 b.c. to commemorate the tribes which had repulsed the persians. the column, originally at delphi, is now at constantinople. the most striking features of the dialect are the retention of [digamma] at the beginning of words, as in the dedication from the 6th century [greek: wanaxibios] (_annual of british school_, xiv. 144). the dialect changed -[sigma]- between vowels into -h-, [greek: moha] for [greek: mosa] "muse." later it changed [theta] into a sound like the english _th_, which was represented by [sigma]. before o-sounds [epsilon] here and in some other doric dialects changed to [iota]: [greek: thios, sios] for [greek: theos] "god." the result of contraction and "compensatory lengthening" was not [greek: ei] and [greek: ou] as in attic and ionic, but [eta] and [omega]: [greek: emen] infinitive = [greek: einai] from *esmen; gen. sing. of _o_-stems in [omega]: [greek: theo], acc. pl. in -[greek: os: theos]; dy was represented by [greek: dd], not [zeta], as in attic-ionic; [greek: musidde = muthize]. the dialect has many strange words, especially in connexion with the state education and organization of the boys and young men. the heraclean tables from a laconian colony in s. italy have curious forms in -[greek: assi] for the dat. pl. of the participle [greek: prassontassi] = attic [greek: prattousi]. of the dialect of messenia we know little, the long inscription about mysteries from andania being only about 100 b.c. from argolis there are a considerable number of early inscriptions, and in a later form of the dialect the cures recorded at the temple of asklepios at epidaurus present many points of interest. there is also an inscription of the 6th century b.c. from the temple of aphaia in aegina. [digamma] survives in the old inscriptions: [greek: wewremena (= eiremena); ns], whether original or arising by sound change from -_nty_, persists till the 2nd century b.c.: [greek: hantitychonsa = he antitychousa, tons huions = tous huious]. the dialect of the inachus valley seems to resemble laconian more closely than does that of the rest of the argolic area. corinth and her colonies in the earliest inscriptions preserve [digamma] and [qoppa] (= latin q) before [omicron] and [upsilon] sounds, and write [xi] and [psi] by [greek: chs] and [greek: phs], the symbols which are used also for this purpose in old attic. in the corcyrean and sicilian forms of the dialect, [lambda] before a dental appears as [nu]: [greek: phintias = philtias]; and in sicilian the perfect-active was treated as a present: [greek: dedoiko] for [greek: dedoika], &c. from megara has come lately an obscure inscription from the beginning of the 5th century; its colony selinus has inscriptions from the middle of the same century; the inscriptions from byzantium and its other pontic colonies date only from hellenistic times. in crete, which shows a considerable variety of subdialects, the most important document is the great inscription from gortyn containing twelve tables of family law, which was discovered in 1884. the local alphabet has no separate symbols for [chi] and [phi], and these sounds are therefore written with [kappa] and [pi]. as in argive the combination -[greek: ns] was kept both medially and finally except before words beginning with a consonant; -_ty_- was represented by [zeta], later by -[greek: tt]-, as in thessalian and boeotian: [greek: hopottoi], attic [greek: hoposoi]; and finally by -[greek: tt]-; [lambda] combined with a preceding vowel into an au-diphthong: [greek: auka], attic [greek: alke], cp. the english pronunciation of _talk_, &c. in gortyn and some other towns -[greek: st]--was assimilated to--[greek: tt], where [theta] must have been a spirant like the english _th_ in _thin_; [zeta] of attic greek is represented initially by [delta], medially by [greek: dd], but in some towns by [tau] and [greek: tt: doos (= zoos), dikadden (= dikazein)]. final consonants are generally assimilated to the beginning of the next word. in inflection there are many local peculiarities. in melos and thera some very old inscriptions have been found written in an alphabet without symbols for [phi], [chi], [phi], [xi], which are therefore written as [pi]h, [kappa]h or [koppa]h, [greek: ps, ks]. the contractions of [epsilon] + [epsilon] and of [omicron] + [omicron] are represented by e and o respectively. the old rock inscriptions of thera are among the most archaic yet discovered. the most characteristic feature of rhodian doric is the infinitive in -[greek: mein: domein], &c. (= attic [greek: dounai]), which passed also to gela and agrigentum. the inscriptions from cos are numerous, but too late to represent the earliest form of the dialect. (b) the dialects of n.w. doric, locrian, phocian, aetolian, with which go elean and achaean, present a more uncouth appearance than the other doric dialects except perhaps cretan. only from locris and phocis come fairly old inscriptions; later a [greek: koine] was developed, in which the documents of the aetolian league are written, and of which the most distinctive mark is the dative plural of consonant stems in -[greek: ois: archontois] (= attic [greek: archousi]), [greek: agonois] (= attic [greek: agosi]), &c. phocian and the locrian of opus have also forms like aeolic in -[greek: essi]. in place of the dative in -[omega], locatives in -[greek: oi] are used in locrian and phocian. generally north of the corinthian gulf the middle present participle from -[greek: eo]-verbs ends in-[greek: eimenos]; similar forms are found also in elean. locrian changed [epsilon] before [rho] into [alpha]: [greek: patara] for [greek: patera]; cf. english _kerr_ and _carr_, _sergeant_ and _sargeaunt_. [greek: st] appears for [greek: st], and [koppa] and [digamma] are still much in use in the 5th century b.c. many thousands of inscriptions were found in the french excavations at delphi, but nothing earlier than the 5th century b.c. in the older inscriptions the aeolic influence--datives in -[greek: essi, onyma] for [greek: onoma]--is better marked than later. in the laws of the labyad phratry (about 400 b.c.) the genitive is in [greek: ou], but a form in -[omega] is also found, [greek: woiko], which seems to be an old ablative fossilized as an adverb. the nom. pl. [greek: dekatetores] is used for the acc.; similar forms are found in elean and achaean. the more important of the older materials for achaean come from the achaean colonies of s. italy, and being scanty give us only an imperfect view of the dialect, but it is clearly in its main features doric. much more remarkable is the elean dialect known chiefly from inscriptions found at olympia, some of which are as early as the beginning of the 6th century. the native dialect was replaced first by a doric and then by the attic [greek: koine], but under the caesars the archaic dialect was restored. many of its characteristics it shares with the dialects north of the corinthian gulf, but it changes original [epsilon] to [alpha]: [greek: ma = me], &c.; [delta] was apparently a spirant, as in modern greek (= _th_ in english _the_, _thine_), and is represented by [zeta] in some of the earliest inscriptions. final -[sigma] became -[rho]; this is found also in laconian; -_ty_- became -[greek: ss]-, but was not simplified as in attic to -[sigma]-: [greek: ossa] = attic [greek: hosa]. as we have seen, ionians, aetolians and dorians tended to level local peculiarities and make a generally intelligible dialect in which treaties and other important records were framed. the language of literature is always of necessity to some extent a [greek: koine]: with some greek writers the use of a [greek: koine] was especially necessary. the local dialect of boeotia was not easily intelligible in other districts, and a writer like pindar, whose patrons were mostly not boeotians, had perforce to write in a dialect that they could understand. hence he writes in a conventional doric with aeolic elements, which forms a strong contrast to that of corinna, who kept more or less closely to the boeotian dialect. for different literary purposes greek had different [greek: koinai]. a poet who would write an epic must adopt a form of language modelled on that of homer and hesiod; alcaeus and sappho were the models for the love lyric, which was therefore aeolic; stesichorus was the founder of the triumphal ode, which, as he was a dorian of sicily, must henceforth be in doric, though pindar was an aeolian, and its other chief representatives, simonides and bacchylides, were ionians from ceos. the choral ode of tragedy was always conventional doric, and in the iambics also are doric words like [greek: drao, lao], &c. elegy and epigram were founded on epic; the satirical iambics of hipponax and his late disciple herondas are ionic. the first greek prose was developed in ionia, of which an excellent example has been preserved to us in herodotus. thucydides was not an ionian, but he could not shake himself free of the tradition: he therefore writes [greek: prasso, tasso], &c., with -[greek: ss]-, which was ionic, but is never found in attic inscriptions nor in the writers who imitate the language of common life--aristophanes (when not parodying tragedy, or other forms of literature or dialect), plato and the orators (with the partial exception of antiphon, who ordinarily has -[greek: ss]-, but in the one speech actually intended for the law-courts -[greek: tt]-). similarly hippocrates and his medical school in cos wrote in ionic, not, however, in the ionic of herodotus, but in a language more akin to the ionic [greek: koine] of the inscriptions; and this dialect continued to be used in medicine later, much as doctors now use latin for their prescriptions. the first literary document written in attic prose is the treatise on the _constitution of athens_, which is generally printed amongst the minor works of xenophon, but really belongs to about 425 b.c. from the fragment of aristophanes' _banqueters_ and from the first speech of lysias "against theomnestos" it is clear that the attic dialect had changed rapidly in the 6th and 5th centuries b.c., and that much of the phraseology of solon's laws was no longer intelligible by 400 b.c. among the most difficult of the literary dialects to trace is the earliest--the homeric dialect. the homeric question cannot be discussed here, and on that question it may be said _quot homines tot sententiae_. to the present writer, however, it seems probable that the poems were composed in chios as tradition asserted; the language contains many aeolisms, and the heroes sung are, except for the athenians (very briefly referred to), and possibly telamonian ajax, not of the ionic stock. chios was itself an ionicized aeolic colony (diodorus v. 81. 7). the hypothesis of a great poet writing on the basis of earlier aeolic lays ([greek: klea andron]) in chios seems to explain the main peculiarities of the homeric language, which, however, was modified to some extent in later times first under ionic and afterwards under athenian influence. of dorian literature we know little. the works of archimedes written in the syracusan dialect were much altered in language by the late copyists. the most striking development of the late classical age in doric lands is that of pastoral poetry, which, like spenser, is "writ in no language," but, on a basis of syracusan and possibly coan doric, has in its structure many elements borrowed from the aeolic love lyric and from epic. from the latter part of the 5th century b.c. athens became ever more important as a literary centre, and attic prose became the model for the later [greek: koine], which grew up as a consequence of the decay of the local dialects. for this decay there were several reasons. if the athenian empire had survived the peloponnesian war, attic influence would no doubt soon have permeated the whole of that empire. this consummation was postponed. attic became the court language of macedon, and, when alexander's conquests led to the foundation of great new towns, like alexandria, filled with inhabitants from all parts of the greek world, this dialect furnished a basis for common intercourse. naturally the resultant dialect was not pure attic. there were in it considerable traces of ionic. in attica itself the dialect was less uniform than elsewhere even in the 5th century b.c., because athens was a centre of empire, literature and commerce. like every other language which is not under the dominion of the schoolmaster, it borrowed the names of foreign objects which it imported from foreign lands, not only from those of greek-speaking peoples, but also from egypt, persia, lydia, phoenicia, thrace and elsewhere. the ionians were great seafarers, and from them athens borrowed words for seacraft and even for the tides: [greek: amtotis] "ebb," [greek: rhachia] "high tide," an ionic word [greek: rhechie] spelt in attic fashion. from the dorians it borrowed words connected with war and sport: [greek: lochagos, kunagos], &c. a soldier of fortune like xenophon, who spent most of his life away from athens, introduced not only strange words but strange grammatical constructions also into his literary compositions. with aristotle, not a born athenian but long resident in athens, the [greek: koine] may be said to have begun. some characteristics of attic foreigners found it hard to acquire--its subtle use of particles and its accent. hence in hellenistic greek particles are comparatively rare. according to cicero, theophrastus, who came from as near attica as eretria in euboea, was easily detected by a market-woman as no athenian after he had lived thirty years in athens. thoucritus, an athenian, who was taken prisoner in the peloponnesian war and lived for many years in epirus as a slave, was unable to recover the athenian accent on his return, and his family lay under the suspicion that they were an alien's children, as his son tells us in demosthenes' speech "against eubulides." in the [greek: koine] there were several divisions, though the line between them is faint and irregular. there was a [greek: koine] of literary men like polybius and of carefully prepared state documents, as at magnesia or pergamum; and a different [greek: koine] of the vulgar which is represented to us in its egyptian form in the pentateuch, in a later and at least partially palestinian form in the gospels. still more corrupt is the language which we find in the ill-written and ill-spelt private letters found amongst the egyptian papyri. not out of the old dialects but out of this [greek: koine] arose modern greek, with a variety of dialects no less bewildering than that of ancient greek. in one place more rapidly, in another more slowly, the characteristics of modern greek begin to appear. as we have seen, in boeotia the vowels and diphthongs began to pass into the characteristic sounds of modern greek four centuries before christ. dorian dialects illustrate early the passing of the old aspirate [greek: th], the sound of which was like the final t in english _bit_, into a sound like the english _th_ in _thin_, _pith_, which it still retains in modern greek. the change of [gamma] between vowels into a y sound was charged by the comic poets against hyperbolus the demagogue about 415 b.c. only when the attic sound changes stood isolated amongst the greek dialects did they give way in the [greek: koine] to ionic. thus the forms with -[greek: ss]- instead of -[greek: tt]- won the day, while modern greek shows that sometimes the -[greek: rr]- which attic shared with some doric dialects and arcadian was retained, and that sometimes the ionic -[greek: rs]-, which was also lesbian and partly doric, took its place. in other cases, where ionic and attic did not agree, forms came in which were different from either: the genitives of masculine a stems were now formed as in doric with [alpha], but the analogy of the other cases may have been the effective force. the form [greek: naos] "temple," instead of ionic [greek: neos], attic [greek: neos], can only be doric.[1] in the first five centuries of the christian era came in the modern greek characteristics of itacism and vowel contraction, of the pronunciation of [greek: mp] and [greek: nt] as _mb_ and _nd_ and many other sound changes, the loss of the dative and the confusion of the 1st with the 3rd declension, the dropping of the -[greek: mi] conjugation, the loss of the optative and the assimilation of the imperfect and second aorist endings to those of the first aorist.[2] there were meantime spasmodic attempts at the revival of the old language. lucian wrote attic dialogue with a facility almost equal to plato; the old dialect was revived in the inscriptions of sparta; balbilla, a lady-in-waiting on hadrian's empress, wrote epigrams in aeolic, and there were other attempts of the same kind. but they were only _tours de force_, [greek: kepoi adonidos], whose flowers had no root in the spoken language and therefore could not survive. even in the hands of a cultivated man like plutarch the [greek: koine] of the 1st century a.d. looks entirely different from attic greek. apart from non-attic constructions, which are not very numerous, the difference consists largely in the new vocabulary of the philosophical schools since aristotle, whose jargon had become part of the language of educated men in plutarch's time, and made a difference in the language not unlike that which has been brought about in english by the development of the natural sciences. it is hardly necessary to say that these changes, whether of the [greek: koine] or of modern greek, did not of necessity impair the powers of the language as an organ of expression; if elaborate inflection were a necessity for the highest literary merit, then we must prefer caedmon to milton and cynewulf to shakespeare. _the chief characteristics of greek._ as is obvious from the foregoing account of the greek dialects, it is not possible to speak of the early history of greek as handed down to us as that of a single uniform tongue. from the earliest times it shows much variety of dialect accentuated by the geographical characteristics of the country, but arising, at least in part, from the fact that the greeks came into the country in separate waves divided from one another by centuries. for the history of the language it is necessary to take as a beginning the form of the indo-european language from which greek descended, so far as it can be reconstructed from a comparison of the individual i.e. languages (see ando-european languages). the sounds of this language, so far as at present ascertained, were the following:-- (a) 11 vowels: _a_, _a_, _e_, _e_, _i_, _i_, _o_, _o_, _u_, _u_, _[schwa]_ (a short indistinct vowel). (b) 14 diphthongs: _ai_, _au_, _ei_, _eu_, _oi_, _ou_, _ai_, _au_, _ei_, _eu_, _oi_, _ou_, _[schwa]i_, _[schwa]u_. (c) 20 stop consonants. labials: _p_, _b_, _ph_, _bh_ (_ph_ and _bh_ being _p_ and _b_ followed by an audible breath, not _f_ and _v_). dentals: _t_, _d_, _th_, _dh_ (_th_ and _dh not_ spirants like the two english sounds in _thin_ and _then_, but aspirated _t_ and _d_). palatals: _k_, _g_, _kh_, _gh_ (_kh_ and _gh_ aspirates as explained above). velars: _q_, _g_, _qh_, _gh_ (velars differ from palatals by being produced against the soft palate instead of the roof of the mouth). labio-velars: _qu_, _qu_, _quh_, _guh_ (these differ from the velars by being combined with a slight labial w-sound). (d) spirants-- labial: _w_. dental: _s_, _z_, post-dental _s_, _z_, interdental possibly [thorn], [eth]. palatal: [chi] (scotch ch), y. velar: _x_ (a deeply guttural [chi], heard now in swiss dialects), [gh]. closely akin to _w_ and _y_ and often confused with them were the semi-vowels _u_ and _i_. (e) liquids: _l_, _r_. (f) nasals: _m_ (labial), _n_ (dental), _n_ (palatal), [symbol] (velar), the last three in combination with similar consonants. (a) as far as the vowels are concerned, greek retains the original state of things more accurately than any other language. the sounds of short _e_ and short _o_ in attic and ionic were close, so that _e_ + _e_ contracted to a long close e represented by [greek: ei], _o_ + _o_ to a long close _o_ represented by [greek: oe]. in these dialects _u_, both long and short, was modified to _u_, and they changed the long _a_ to _e_, though attic has [alpha] after [epsilon], [iota] and [rho]. in greek [schwa] appeared regularly as [alpha], but under the influence of analogy often as [epsilon] and [omicron]. (b) the short diphthongs as a whole remained unchanged before a following consonant. before a following vowel the diphthong was divided between the two syllables, the [iota] or [upsilon] forming a consonant at the beginning of the second syllable, which ultimately disappeared. thus from a root dheu- "run" comes a verb [greek: theo] for [greek: the-wo], from an earlier *[greek: theu-o]. the corresponding adjective is [greek: thoos] "swift," for [greek: tho-wo-s], from an earlier *[greek: thou-o-s]. the only dialect which kept the whole diphthong in one syllable was aeolic. the long diphthongs, except at the ends of words, were shortened in attic. some of these appear merely as long vowels, having lost their second element in the proethnic period. apparent long diphthongs like those in [greek: letourgia, sozo] arise by contraction of two syllables. (c) the consonants suffered more extensive change. the voiced aspirates became unvoiced, so that _bh_, _dh_, _gh_, _gh_, _guh_ are confused with original _ph_, _th_, _kh_, _qh_, _quh_: i.e. *_bhero_ (skt. _bharami_) is gr. [greek: phero]; i.e. *_dhumos_ (skt. _dhumas_), gr. [greek: thymos]; i.e. *_ghimo_- (skt. _hima_-), gr. [greek: (dys)-chimo-s]; i.e. *_stigh_- (skt. _stigh_-), gr. [greek: stiches]; i.e. _guhen_- (skt. _han_-), gr. [greek: theino] (probably), [greek: phonos]. the palatal and velar series cannot be distinguished in greek; for the differences between them resort must be had to languages of the _satem_-group, such as sanskrit, zend or slavonic, where the palatals appear as sibilants (see indo-european languages). the labio-velar series present a great variety of forms in the different greek dialects, and in the same dialect before different sounds. thus in attic before _o_ vowels, nasals and liquids, the series appears as [pi], [beta], [phi]; before _e_ and _i_ vowels as [tau], [beta] ([delta]), [theta]; in combination with _u_, which led to loss of the u by dissimilation, [kappa], [gamma] [chi]. thus [greek: hepomai] corresponds to the latin _sequo-r_, apart from the ending; [greek: bous] to latin _bos_ (borrowed from sabine), english _cow_; [greek: phonos] "slaughter," [greek: epephnon], old irish _gonim_, "i wound." parallel to these forms with _p_ are forms in the italic languages except latin and faliscan, and in the cymric group of the celtic languages. the dental forms [tau], [delta], [theta] stand by themselves. thus [greek: tis] (from the same root as [greek: pou, poi, pothen], etc.) is parallel to the latin _quis_, the oscan _pis_, old irish cia, welsh _pwy_, "who?" "what?"; attic [greek: tettares], ionic [greek: tesseres] "four" is parallel to latin _quattuor_, oscan [greek: petora], old irish _cethir_, old welsh _petguar_; [greek: tisis] is from the same root as [greek: poine]. for the voiced sound, [beta] is much more common than [delta] before _e_ and _i_ sounds; thus [greek: bios] "life," from the same root as skt. _jivas_, latin _vivus_; [greek: bios] "bowstring," skt. _jya_, &c. in arcado-cyprian and aeolic, [pi] and [beta] often precede _e_ and _i_ sounds. thus parallel to attic [greek: tettares] lesbian has [greek: pessyres], homer [greek: pisyres], boeotian [greek: pettares]; thessalian [greek: bellomai], boeotian [greek: beilomai] alongside of attic [greek: boulomai], lesbian [greek: bollomai], doric [greek: bolomai] and also [greek: delomai]. in arcadian and cyprian the form corresponding to [greek: tis] was [greek: sis], in thessalian [greek: kis], where the labialization was lost (see the article on q). a great variety of changes in the stopped consonants arose in combination with other sounds, especially _i_ (a semivowel of the nature of english _y_), _u_ (_w_) and _s_; -[greek: ti-, -thi]- became first -[greek: ss]- and later -[sigma]- in attic greek, -[greek: tt]- in boeotian (the precise pronunciation of -[greek: ss]- and -[greek: tt]- is uncertain): attic [greek: ho-posos], earlier [greek: ho-possos], boeotian [greek: ho-pottos], from the same stem as the latin _quot_, _quotiens_; homeric [greek: messos], attic [greek: mesos] from *[greek: methios], latin _medius_; -[greek: ki-, -chi]- became -[greek: ss]-, attic -[greek: tt-: pissa] "pitch," attic [greek: pitta] from *[greek: pikia], cp. latin _pix_, _picis_, [greek: elasson], attic [greek: elatton] comparative to [greek: elachus]. [greek: di] and [greek: gi] became [zeta]: [greek: zeus] (skt. _dyaus_) [greek: elpizo] from [greek: elpis], stem [greek: elpid]-"hope," [greek: mastizo] from [greek: mastix], stem [greek: mastig]- "lash." (d) the sound _u_ was represented in the greek alphabet by [digamma], the "digamma," but in attic and ionic the sound was lost very early. in aeolic, particularly boeotian and lesbian, it was persistent, and so also in many doric dialects, especially at the beginning of words. when the ionic alphabet was adopted by districts which had retained [digamma], it was represented by [beta]: [greek: brodon] aeolic for [greek: rodon], i.e. [greek: drodon]. in attic it disappeared, leaving no trace; in ionic it lengthened the preceding syllable; thus in homer [greek: hupodeisas] is scanned with o long because the root of the verb contained [digamma]: [greek: ddei]-. attic has [greek: xenos], but ionic [greek: xeinos] for [greek: xenwos]. its combination with [tau] became -[greek: ss]-, attic and boeotian -[greek: tt]-, in [greek: tesseres, tettares, pettares] for i.e. [greek: guetu]-. but the most effective of all elements in changing the appearance of greek words was the sound _s_. before vowels at the beginning, or between vowels in the middle of words, it passed into an _h_ sound, the "rough breathing." thus [greek: hepta] is the same word as the latin _septem_, english _seven_; [greek: hal-s] has the same stem as the latin _sal_, english _sal-t_; [greek: euo] for [greek: euho] is the same as the latin _uro_ (*_euso_). combined with _i_ or _u_ also it passes into _h_; [greek: hymen], skt. _syuman_, "band"; [greek: hedus], doric [greek: adus], latin _sua(d)vis_, english sweet; cp. [greek: oikoio] for *[greek: woikosio, neos], lesbian [greek: nauos] "temple," through [greek: nawos] from *[greek: naswo-s] connected with [greek: naio] "dwell." before nasals and liquids _s_ was assimilated: [greek: mei-dao], latin _mi-ru-s_, english _smile_; [greek: nipha], latin _nivem_, english _snow_; [greek: lego], latin _laxus_, english _slack_; [greek: rheo] from *_sreu-o_ of the same origin as english _stream_ (where _t_ is a later insertion), imperfect [greek: erreon] for *_esreuom_; cp. also [greek: philommeides, aganniphos, allektos]. after nasals _s_ is assimilated except finally; when assimilated, in all dialects except aeolic the previous syllable is lengthened if not already long: attic [greek: eneima, emeina] for the first aorist *_enemsa_, *_emensa_; but [greek: tons, tans], &c., of the accusative pl. either remained or became in aeolic [greek: tois, tais], in ionic and attic [greek: tous, tas], in doric [greek: tos, tas]; cp. [greek: titheis] for *[greek: tithents, bas] for *[greek: bants, heis] "one" for *sem-s, then by analogy of the neuter *sens. assimilation of [sigma] to preceding [rho] and [lambda] is a matter of dialect: ionic [greek: tharseo], but attic [greek: tharro], and so also the doric of thera: [greek: ekelsa], but [greek: esteila] for *[greek: ettelsa]. with nasals [iota] affected the previous syllable: [greek: tektaino] (*[greek: tekteio]), where _n_ is the nasal of the stem [greek: tekton], itself forming a syllable (see the article n for these so-called sonant nasals). before [iota] original _m_ becomes _n_; hence [greek: baino] with _n_, though from the same root as english _come_. original [iota] does not survive in greek, but is represented by the aspirate at the beginning of words, [greek: hagnos] = skt. _yajnas_; medially after consonants it disappears, affecting the preceding consonant or syllable where a consonant precedes; between vowels it disappears. a sound of the same kind is indicated in cyprian and some other dialects as a glide or transition sound between two vowels. (e) the most remarkable feature in the treatment of the nasals is that when _n_ or _m_ forms a syllable by itself its consonant character disappears altogether and it is represented by the vowel [alpha] only: [greek: tatos], latin _tentus_, [alpha]- negative particle, latin _in_, english _un_; [greek: ha-ploos] has the same prefix as the latin _sim-plex_ (_sm_). the liquids in similar cases show [greek: la] or [greek: al] and [greek: ra] or [greek: ar: te-tla-men, pe-paltai; edrakon, thrasys, tharsos]. the ends of words were modified in appearance by the loss of all stop-consonants and the change of final _m_ to _n_, [greek: edeixe], latin _dixit_; [greek: zygon], latin _iugum_. _accent._--the vowel system of greek has been so well preserved because it shows till late times very little in the way of stress accent. as in early sanskrit the accent was predominantly a pitch accent (see accent). _noun system._--the i.e. noun had three numbers, but the dual was limited to pairs, the two hands, the two horses in the chariot, and was so little in use that the original form of the oblique cases cannot be restored with certainty. ionic has no dual. the i.e. noun had the following cases: nominative, accusative, genitive, ablative, instrumental, locative and dative. the vocative was not properly a case, because it usually stands outside the syntactical construction of the sentence; when a distinctive form appears, it is the bare stem, and there is no form (separate from the nominative) for the plural. greek has confused genitive and ablative (the distinction between them seems to have been derived from the pronouns), except for the solitary [greek: woiko = oikothen] in an inscription of delphi. the instrumental, locative and dative are mixed in one case, partly for phonetic, partly for syntactical reasons. in arcadian, elean, boeotian, and later widely in n. greece, the locative -[greek: oi] is used for the dative. the masculine _a_-stems make the nom. in most dialects in -[greek: as]. the genitive is in -[greek: ao] (with [omicron] borrowed from the _o_-stems), which remains in homer and boeotian, appears in arcado-cyprian as -[greek: au], and with metathesis of quantity -[greek: eo] in ionic. the attic form in -[greek: ou] is borrowed directly from the _o_-stems. in the plural the -[alpha] and -_o_ stems follow the article in making their nominatives in -[greek: ai] and -[greek: oi] instead of the original -_as_ and -_os_. the neuter plural was in origin a collective singular, and for this reason takes a singular verb; the plural of [greek: zygon] "yoke" was originally *_iuga_, and declined like any other -a stem. but through the influence of the masculine and feminine forms the neuter took the same oblique cases, and like its own singular made the accusative the same as the nominative. in the plural of -_a_ and -_o_ stems, the locative in -[greek: aisi, -oisi] was long kept apart from the instrumental-dative form in -[greek: ais, -ois]. _the verb system._--the verb system of greek is more complete than that of any of the other i.e. languages. its only rival, the early vedic verb system, is already in decay when history begins, and when the classical period of sanskrit arrives the moods have broken down, and the aorist, perfect, and imperfect tenses are syntactically confused. throughout the greek classical period the moods are maintained, but in the period of the [greek: koine] the optative occurs less and less and finally disappears. the original i.e. had two voices, an active and a middle, and to these greek has added a third, the passive, distinguished from the middle in many verbs by separate forms for the future and aorist, made with a syllable -[greek: the-, timethesomai, etimethen], though in this instance, [greek: timesomai], the future middle, is often used with a passive sense. other forms which greek has added to the original system are the pluperfect--in form a past of the perfect stem with aorist endings. it merely expressed the perfect action in past time, and, except as derived from the context, did not possess the notion of relative time (past at a time already past), which attaches to the latin forms with the same name. the future optative was also a new formation, betraying its origin in the fact that it is almost entirely limited to _oratio obliqua_. the aorist imperatives were also new; the history of some of them, as the second sing. act. [greek: pauson], is not very clear. the whole verb system is affected by the distinction between -_o_ and -_mi_ verbs; the former or thematic verbs have a so-called "thematic vowel" between the root and the personal suffix, while the -_mi_ verbs attach the suffixes directly to the root. the distinction is really one between monosyllabic and disyllabic roots. the history of the personal endings is not altogether clear; the -_o_ verbs have in the present forms for the 2nd and 3rd person in -[greek: eis] and -[greek: ei], which are not yet elucidated. in the middle, greek does not entirely agree with sanskrit in its personal endings, and the original forms cannot all be restored with certainty. the endings of the primary tenses differed from those of the secondary, but there has been a certain amount of confusion between them. the syntax of the verb is founded on the original i.e. distinction of the verb forms, not by time (tense), but by forms of action, progressive action (present and imperfect), consummated action (aorist), state arising from action, emphatic or repeated action (perfect). for the details of this see indo-european languages. bibliography.--(i.) a grammar of greek, which will deal fully with the whole material of the language, is at present a _desideratum_, and is hardly possible so long as new dialect material is being constantly added and while comparatively so little has been done on the syntax of the dialects. the greatest collection of material is to be found in the new edition of kuhner's _griechische grammatik, laut- und formenlehre_, by blass (2 vols., 1890-1892); _syntax_, by gerth (2 vols., 1896, 1900). blass's part is useful only for material, the explanations being entirely antiquated. the only full historical account of the language (sounds, forms and syntax) at present in existence is k. brugmann's _griechische grammatik_ (3rd ed., 1900). gustav meyer's _griechische grammatik_ (nothing on accent or syntax), which did excellent pioneer work when it first appeared in 1880, was hardly brought up to date in its 3rd edition (1896), but is still useful for the dialect and bibliographical material collected. see also h. hirt, _handbuch der griech. laut- und formenlehre_ (1902). of smaller grammars in english perhaps the most complete is that of j. thompson (london, 1902). the grammar of homer was handled by d. b. monro (2nd ed., oxford, 1891). the syntax has been treated in many special works, amongst which may be mentioned w. w. goodwin, _syntax of the greek moods and tenses_ (new ed., 1889); b. l. gildersleeve and c. w. e. miller, _syntax of classical greek from homer to demosthenes_, pt. i. (new york, 1901--and following); j. m. stahl, _kritisch-historische syntax des griechischen verbums_ (1907); f. e. thompson, _attic greek syntax_ (1907). (ii.) the relations between greek and the other i.e. languages are very well brought out in p. kretschmer's _einleitung in die geschichte der griechischen sprache_ (gottingen, 1896). for comparative grammar see k. brugmann and b. delbruck, _grundriss der vergleichenden grammatik der indogermanischen sprachen_ (the 2nd ed., begun 1897, is still incomplete) and brugmann's _kurze vergleichende grammatik_ (1902-1903); a. meillet, _introduction a l'etude comparative des langues indo-europeennes_ (2nd ed., 1908). greek compared with latin and english: p. giles, _a short manual of comparative philology for classical students_ (2nd ed., 1901, with an appendix containing a brief account and specimens of the dialects); riemann and goelzer, _grammaire comparative du grec et du latin_ (1901), a parallel grammar in 2 vols., specially valuable for syntax. (iii.) for the dialects two works have recently appeared, both covering in brief space the whole field: a. thumb, _handbuch der griechischen dialekte_ (with bibliographies for each dialect, 1909); c. d. buck, _introduction to the study of the greek dialects, grammar, selected inscriptions, glossary_ (boston, 1910). works on a larger scale have been undertaken by r. meister, by o. hoffmann and by h. w. smyth. for the [greek: koine] may be specially mentioned a. thumb, _die griech. sprache in zeitalter des hellenismus_ (1901); e. mayser, _grammatik der griechischen papyri aus der ptolemaerzeit: laut- und wortlehre_ (1906); h. st j. thackeray, _a grammar of the old testament in greek_, vol. i. (1909); blass, _grammar of new testament greek_, trans. by thackeray (1898); j. h. moulton, _a grammar of new testament greek. i. prolegomena_ (3rd ed., 1906). (iv.) for the development from the [greek: koine] to modern greek: a. n. jannaris, _an historical greek grammar, chiefly of the attic dialect, as written and spoken from classical antiquity down to the present time_ (1901); g. n. hatzidakis, _einleitung in die neugriechische grammatik_ (1892); a. thumb, _handbuch der neugriechischen volkssprache_ (2nd ed. 1910). (v.) the inscriptions are collected in _inscriptiones graecae_ in the course of publication by the berlin academy, those important for dialect in the _sammlung der griech. dialektinschriften_, edited by collitz and bechtel. the earlier parts of this collection are to some extent superseded by later volumes of the _inscr. graecae_, containing better readings and new inscriptions. a good selection (too brief) is solmsen's _inscriptiones graecae ad inlustrandas dialectos selectae_ (3rd ed., 1910). a serviceable lexicon for dialect words is van herwerden's _lexicon graecum suppletorium et dialecticum_ (2nd ed., much enlarged, 2 vols. 1910). (vi.) the historical basis for the distribution of the greek dialects is discussed at length in the histories of e. meyer (_geschichte des altertums_, ii.) and g. busolt (_griechische geschichte_, i.); by professor ridgeway, _early age of greece_, i. (1901), and p. kretschmer in _glotta_, i. 9 ff. see also a. fick, _die vorgriechischen ortsnamen_ (1905). (vii.) bibliographies containing the new publications on greek, with some account of their contents, appear from time to time in _indogermanische forschungen: anzeiger_ (strassburg, trubner), annually in _glotta_ (gottingen, vandenhoeck und ruprecht), and _the year's work in classical studies_ (london, murray). (p. gi.) footnotes: [1] thumb, _die griechische sprache im zeitalter des hellenismus_ (1901), pp. 242-243. [2] thumb, _op. cit._ p. 249.