{
    "system": "GoGuides Verified Text",
    "api_version": "verified-text-v1",
    "status": "ok",
    "response_type": "verified_text_record",
    "source_key": "britannica_1911",
    "source_title": "Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911)",
    "license_code": "public_domain",
    "attribution": null,
    "license_url": null,
    "chunk_id": "1911:fellows:25e0ed18583b",
    "title": "FELLOWS",
    "section": null,
    "hash_alg": "sha256",
    "hash_sha256": "47fc8bd36b608e5eb3949bf66702eddeab67e3e5fa614956c48a8ef80f995920",
    "normalizer": {
        "name": "ggnorm",
        "version": "1.0"
    },
    "verified_text": "fellows, sir charles (1799-1860), british archaeologist, was born in august 1799 at nottingham, where his family had an estate. when fourteen he drew sketches to illustrate a trip to the ruins of newstead abbey, which afterwards appeared on the title-page of moore's _life of lord byron_. in 1820 he settled in london, where he became an active member of the british association. in 1827 he discovered the modern ascent of mont blanc. after the death of his mother in 1832 he passed the greater portion of his time in italy, greece and the levant. the numerous sketches he executed were largely used in illustrating c_hilde harold_. in 1838 he went to asia minor, making smyrna his headquarters. his explorations in the interior and the south led him to districts practically unknown to europeans, and he thus discovered ruins of a number of ancient cities. he entered lycia and explored the xanthus from the mouth at patara upwards. nine miles from patara he discovered the ruins of xanthus, the ancient capital of lycia, finely situated on hills, and abounding in magnificent remains. about 15 m. farther up he came upon the ruins of tlos. after taking sketches of the most interesting objects and copying a number of inscriptions, he returned to smyrna through caria and lydia. the publication of _a journal written during an excursion in asia minor_ (london, 1839) roused such interest that lord palmerston, at the request of the british museum authorities, asked the british consul at constantinople to get leave from the sultan to ship a number of the lycian works of art. late in 1839 fellows, under the auspices of the british museum, again set out for lycia, accompanied by george scharf, who assisted him in sketching. this second visit resulted in the discovery of thirteen ancient cities, and in 1841 appeared _an account of discoveries in lycia, being a journal kept during a second excursion in asia minor_. a third visit was made late in 1841, after fellows had obtained a _firman_ by personal application at constantinople. he shipped a number of works of art for england, and in the fourth and most famous expedition (1844) twenty-seven cases of marbles were despatched to the british museum. his chief discoveries were at xanthus, pinara, patara, tlos, myra and olympus. in 1844 he presented to the british museum his portfolios, accounts of his expeditions, and specimens of natural history illustrative of lycia. in 1845 he was knighted \"as an acknowledgment of his services in the removal of the xanthian antiquities to this country.\" he paid his own expenses in all his journeys and received no public reward. fellows was twice married. he died in london on the 8th of november 1860. in addition to the works above mentioned, fellows published the following: _the xanthian marbles; their acquisition and transmission to england_ (1843), a refutation of false statements that had been published; _an account of the ionic trophy monument excavated at xanthus_ (1848); a cheap edition of his two _journals_, entitled _travels and researches in asia minor, particularly in the province of lycia_ (1852); and _coins of ancient lycia before the reign of alexander; with an essay on the relative dates of the lycian monuments in the british museum_ (1855). see c. brown's _lives of nottinghamshire worthies_ (1882), pp. 352-353, and _journ. of roy. geog. soc._, 1861. felo de se (m.l. a felon, i.e. murderer, of himself), one who commits murder upon himself. the technical conditions of murder apply to this crime; e.g., \"if one commits any unlawful malicious act, the consequence of which is his own death, as if attempting to kill another he runs upon his antagonist's sword, or shooting at another the gun bursts and kills himself,\" he is a _felo de se_. the horror inspired by this crime led to the revolting punishment of an \"ignominious burial on the highway, with a stake driven through the body.\" this was abolished by an act of 1823, which ordered the burial of the body of a person found to be _felo de se_ within 24 hours after the coroner's inquest, between the hours of 9 and 12 at night, and without christian rites of sepulture. this act was again superseded in 1882 by the interments (_felo de se_) act, which permits the interment of any _felo de se_ in the churchyard or other burial ground of the parish or place in which by the law or custom of england he might have been interred but for the verdict. the interment is carried out in accordance with the burial laws amendment act 1880 (see burial and burial acts). the act does not authorize the performance of any of the rites of christian burial, but a special form of service may be used. formerly the goods and chattels, but not the land, of a _felo de se_ were forfeited to the crown, but such forfeitures were abolished by the forfeiture act 1870. (see also suicide.) felony (o. fr. _felonie_, from _felon_, a word meaning \"wicked,\" common to romanic languages, cf. italian _fello_, _fellone_, the ultimate origin of which is obscure, but is possibly connected either with lat. _fel_, gall, or _fallere_, to deceive. the english \"fell\" cruel or fierce, is also connected; and the greek [greek: phelus], an impostor, has also been suggested). legal writers have sought to throw light on the nature of felony by examining the supposed etymology of the word. coke says it is _crimen animo felleo perpetratum_ [a crime committed with malicious or evil intent (_fee lohn_)]. spelman connects it with the word _fee_, signifying fief or feud; and felony in this way would be equivalent to _pretium feudi_, an act for which a man lost or gave up his fee (see stephen's _commentaries_, vol. iv. p. 7). and acts involving forfeiture were styled felonies in feudal law, although they had nothing of a criminal character about them. a breach of duty on the part of the vassal, neglect of service, delay in seeking investiture, and the like were felonies: so were injuries by the lord against the vassal. modern writers are now disposed to accept coke's definition. in english law, crimes are usually classified as treason, felony, misdemeanour and summary offence. some writers--and with some justice--treat treason merely as a grave form of felony and it is so dealt with in the juries detention act 1897. but owing to legislation in and since the time of william and mary, the procedure for the trial of most forms of treason differs from that of felony. the expression summary offence is ambiguous. many offences which are at common law or by statute felonies, or misdemeanours indictable at common law or by statute, may under certain conditions be tried by a court of summary jurisdiction (q.v.), and many merely statutory offences which would ordinarily be punishable summarily may at the election of the accused be tried by a jury on indictment (summary jurisdiction act 1879, s. 17). the question whether a particular offence is felony or misdemeanour can be answered only by reference to the history of the offence and not by any logical test. for instance, killing a horse in an unlicensed place is still felony under a statute of 1786. but most crimes described as felonies are or have been capital offences at common law or by statute, and have also entailed on the offender attaint and forfeiture of goods. a few felonies were not punishable by death, e.g. petty larceny and mayhem. where an offence is declared a felony by statute, the common law punishments and incidents of trial attach, unless other statutory provision is made (blackstone, _commentaries_, iv. 94). the chief common law _felonies_ are: homicide, rape, larceny (i.e. in ordinary language, theft), robbery (i.e. theft with violence), burglary and kindred offences. counterfeiting the coin has been made a felony instead of being treason; and forgery of most documents has been made a felony instead of being, as it was at common law, a misdemeanour. at the beginning of the 19th century felony was almost equivalent to capital crime; but during that century capital punishment was abolished as to all felonies, except wilful murder, piracy with violence (7 w. iv. & 1 vict. c. 88, s. 2) and offences against the dockyards, &c., protection act 1772; and by the forfeiture act 1870, a felon no longer forfeits land or goods on conviction, though forfeiture on outlawry is not abolished. the usual punishment for felony under the present law is penal servitude or imprisonment with or without hard labour. \"every person convicted of any felony for which no punishment is specially provided by the law in force for the time being is liable upon conviction thereof to be sentenced to penal servitude for any period not exceeding seven years, or to be imprisoned with or without hard labour for any term not exceeding two years\" (stephen, _dig. cr. law_ (6th ed.), art 18, penal servitude act 1891). a felon may not be fined or whipped on conviction nor put under recognizance to keep the peace or be of good behaviour except under statutory provision. (see offences against the person act 1861, ss. 5. 71.) the result of legislative changes is that at the present time the only practical distinctions between felony and misdemeanour are:-- 1. that a private person may arrest a felon without judicial authority and that bail on arrest is granted as a matter of discretion and not as of right. any one who has obtained a drove of oxen or a flock of sheep by false pretences may go quietly on his way and no one, not even a peace officer, can apprehend him without a warrant, but if a man offers to sell another a bit of dead fence supposed to have been stolen, he not only may but is required to be apprehended by that person (greaves, _criminal law consolidation acts_). (see arrest, bail.) 2. that on an indictment for felony counts may not be joined for different felonies unless they form part of the same transaction. (see indictment.) 3. that on a trial for felony the accused has a right peremptorily to challenge, or object to, the jurors called to try him, up to the number of twenty. (see jury.) 4. that a felon cannot be tried _in absentia_, and that the jury who try him may not separate during the trial without leave of the court, which may not be given in cases of murder. 5. that a special jury cannot be empanelled to try a felony. 6. that peers charged with felony are tried in a special manner. (see peerage.) 7. that the costs of prosecuting all felonies (except treason felony) are paid out of public funds: and that a felon may be condemned to pay the costs of his prosecution and to compensate up to l100 for any loss of property suffered by any person through or by means of the felony. in the criminal code bills of 1878-1880 it was proposed to abolish the term felony altogether: and in the queensland criminal code 1899 the term \"crime\" is substituted, and within its connotation are included not only treason and piracy but also perjury. 8. that a sentence of a felon to death, or to penal servitude or imprisonment with hard labour or for over twelve months, involves loss of and disqualification for certain offices until the sentence has been served or a free pardon obtained. (forfeiture act 1870.) it is a misdemeanour (i.) to compound a felony or to agree for valuable consideration not to prosecute or to show favour in such prosecution; (ii.) to omit to inform the authorities of a felony known to have been committed (see misprision), and, (iii.) not to assist in the arrest of a felon at the call of an officer of the law. (see criminal law; misdemeanour; misprision.)",
    "source_url": "https://archive.org/details/EB1911WMF",
    "observed_at": "2026-02-08 18:42:53",
    "integrity": {
        "hash_check": "match",
        "hash_scope": "full_normalized_text",
        "computed_sha256": "47fc8bd36b608e5eb3949bf66702eddeab67e3e5fa614956c48a8ef80f995920"
    },
    "machine_use": {
        "read": true,
        "cite": true,
        "decision": "verified_public_domain_text"
    },
    "goguides_data_license": "https://www.goguides.com/data-license",
    "goguides_data_license_version": "2.0",
    "documentation": {
        "white_paper_url": "https://www.goguides.com/white-paper.php",
        "pdf_url": "https://www.goguides.com/whitepapers/goguides-ai-source-clearance-white-paper.pdf"
    }
}