ERNESTI

ernesti, johann august (1707-1781), german theologian and philologist, was born on the 4th of august 1707, at tennstadt in thuringia, of which place his father was pastor, besides being superintendent of the electoral dioceses of thuringia, salz and sangerhausen. at the age of sixteen he was sent to the celebrated saxon cloister school of pforta (schulpforta). at twenty he entered the university of wittenberg, and studied afterwards at the university of leipzig. in 1730 he was made master in the faculty of philosophy. in the following year he accepted the office of conrector in the thomas school of leipzig, of which j.m. gesner was then rector, an office to which ernesti succeeded in 1734. he was, in 1742, named professor _extraordinarius_ of ancient literature in the university of leipzig, and in 1756 professor _ordinarius_ of rhetoric. in the same year he received the degree of doctor of theology, and in 1759 was appointed professor _ordinarius_ in the faculty of theology. through his learning and his manner of discussion, he co-operated with s.j. baumgarten of halle (1706-1757) in disengaging the current dogmatic theology from its many scholastic and mystical excrescences, and thus paved a way for a revolution in theology. he died, after a short illness, in his seventy-sixth year, on the 11th of september 1781. it is perhaps as much from the impulse which ernesti gave to sacred and profane criticism in germany, as from the intrinsic excellence of his own works in either department, that he must derive his reputation as a philologist or theologian. with j.s. semler he co-operated in the revolution of lutheran theology, and in conjunction with gesner he instituted a new school in ancient literature. he detected grammatical niceties in latin, in regard to the consecution of tenses which had escaped preceding critics. his canons are, however, not without exceptions. as an editor of the greek classics, ernesti hardly deserves to be named beside his dutch contemporaries, tiberius hemsterhuis (1685-1766), l.c. valckenaer (1715-1785), david ruhnken (1723-1798), or his colleague j.j. reiske (1716-1774). the higher criticism was not even attempted by ernesti. but to him and to gesner is due the credit of having formed, by discipline and by example, philologists greater than themselves, and of having kindled the national enthusiasm for ancient learning. it is chiefly in hermeneutics that ernesti has any claim to eminence as a theologian. but here his merits are distinguished, and, at the period when his _institutio interpretis n. t._ was published (1761), almost peculiar to himself. in it we find the principles of a general interpretation, formed without the assistance of any particular philosophy, but consisting of observations and rules which, though already enunciated, and applied in the criticism of the profane writers, had never rigorously been employed in biblical exegesis. he was, in fact, the founder of the grammatico-historical school. he admits in the sacred writings as in the classics only one acceptation, and that the grammatical, convertible into and the same with the logical and historical. consequently he censures the opinion of those who in the illustration of the scriptures refer everything to the illumination of the holy spirit, as well as that of others who, disregarding all knowledge of the languages, would explain words by things. the "analogy of faith," as a rule of interpretation, he greatly limits, and teaches that it can never afford of itself the explanation of words, but only determine the choice among their possible meanings. at the same time he seems unconscious of any inconsistency between the doctrine of the inspiration of the bible as usually received and his principles of hermeneutics. among his works the more important are:--i. in classical literature: _initia doctrinae solidioris_ (1736), many subsequent editions; _initia rhetorica_ (1730); editions, mostly annotated, of xenophon's _memorabilia_ (1737), cicero (1737-1739), suetonius (1748), tacitus (1752), the _clouds_ of aristophanes (1754), homer (1759-1764), callimachus (1761), polybius (1764), as well as of the _quaestura_ of corradus, the greek lexicon of hedericus, and the _bibliotheca latina_ of fabricius (unfinished); _archaeologia litteraria_ (1768), new and improved edition by martini (1790); horatius tursellinus _de particulis_ (1769). ii. in sacred literature: _antimuratorius sive confutatio disputationis muratorianae de rebus liturgicis_ (1755-1758); _neue theologische bibliothek_, vols. i. to x. (1760-1769); _institutio interpretis nov. test._ (3rd ed., 1775); _neueste theologische bibliothek_, vols. i. to x. (1771-1775). besides these, he published more than a hundred smaller works, many of which have been collected in the three following publications:--_opuscula oratoria_ (1762, 2nd ed., 1767); _opuscula philologica et critica_ (1764, 2nd ed., 1776); _opuscula theologica_ (1773). see herzog-hauck, _realencyklopadie_; j.e. sandys, _hist. of class. schol._ iii. (1908).