GoGuides Verified Text

COTTA

SHA-256 integrity check: match
Source
Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911) / britannica_1911
License
public_domain
Chunk ID
1911:cotta:c0388a9f9741
Section
Hash Algorithm
sha256
Stored Hash
2d7bc3477127f245884df0efa559f67b8e42ba0b40fd5ba701a306370a6d8024
Computed Hash
2d7bc3477127f245884df0efa559f67b8e42ba0b40fd5ba701a306370a6d8024
Normalizer
ggnorm 1.0
Observed
2026-02-08 18:42:29
Source URL

Verified Text

cotta, gaius aurelius (c. 124-73 b.c.), roman statesman and orator. in 92 he defended his uncle p. rutilius rufus, who had been unjustly accused of extortion in asia. he was on intimate terms with the tribune m. livius drusus, who was murdered in 91, and in the same year was an unsuccessful candidate for the tribunate. shortly afterwards he was prosecuted under the _lex varia_, directed against all who had in any way supported the italians against rome, and, in order to avoid condemnation, went into voluntary exile. he did not return till 82, during the dictatorship of sulla. in 75 he was consul, and excited the hostility of the optimates by carrying a law that abolished the sullan disqualification of the tribunes from holding higher magistracies; another law _de judiciis privatis_, of which nothing is known, was abrogated by his brother. in 74 cotta obtained the province of gaul, and was granted a triumph for some victory of which we possess no details; but on the very day before its celebration an old wound broke out, and he died suddenly. according to cicero, p. sulpicius rufus and cotta were the best speakers of the young men of their time. physically incapable of rising to passionate heights of oratory, cotta's successes were chiefly due to his searching investigation of facts; he kept strictly to the essentials of the case and avoided all irrelevant digressions. his style was pure and simple. he is introduced by cicero as an interlocutor in the _de oratore_ and _de natura deorum_ (iii.), as a supporter of the principles of the new academy. the fragments of sallust contain the substance of a speech delivered by cotta in order to calm the popular anger at a deficient corn-supply. see cicero, _de oratore_, iii. 3, _brutus_, 49, 55, 90, 92; sallust, _hist. frag._; appian, _bell. civ._ i. 37. his brother, lucius aurelius cotta, when praetor in 70 b.c. brought in a law for the reform of the jury lists, by which the judices were to be eligible, not from the senators exclusively as limited by sulla, but from senators, equites and _tribuni aerarii_. one-third were to be senators, and two-thirds men of equestrian census, one-half of whom must have been _tribuni aerarii_, a body as to whose functions there is no certain evidence, although in cicero's time they were reckoned by courtesy amongst the equites. in 66 cotta and l. manlius torquatus accused the consuls-elect for the following year of bribery in connexion with the elections; they were condemned, and cotta and torquatus chosen in their places. after the suppression of the catilinarian conspiracy, cotta proposed a public thanksgiving for cicero's services, and after the latter had gone into exile, supported the view that there was no need of a law for his recall, since the law of clodius was legally worthless. he subsequently attached himself to caesar, and it was currently reported that cotta (who was then quindecimvir) intended to propose that caesar should receive the title of king, it being written in the books of fate that the parthians could only be defeated by a king. cotta's intention was not carried out in consequence of the murder of caesar, after which he retired from public life. see cicero, orelli's _onomasticon_; sallust, _catiline_, 18; suetonius, _caesar_, 79; livy, _epit._ 97; vell. pat. ii. 32; dio cassius xxxvi. 44, xxxvii. 1. cottabus (gr. [greek: kottabos]), a game of skill for a long time in great vogue at ancient greek drinking parties, especially in the 4th and 5th centuries b.c. it is frequently alluded to by the classical writers of the period, and not seldom depicted on ancient vases. the object of the player was to cast a portion of wine left in his drinking cup in such a way that, without breaking bulk in its passage through the air, it should reach a certain object set up as a mark, and there produce a distinct noise by its impact. both the wine thrown and the noise made were called [greek: latax]. the thrower, in the ordinary form of the game, was expected to retain the recumbent position that was usual at table, and, in flinging the cottabus, to make use of his right hand only. to succeed in the aim no small amount of dexterity was required, and unusual ability in the game was rated as high as corresponding excellence in throwing the javelin. not only was the cottabus the ordinary accompaniment of the festal assembly, but at least in sicily a special building of a circular form was sometimes erected so that the players might be easily arranged round the basin, and follow each other in rapid succession. like all games in which the element of chance found a place, it was regarded as more or less ominous of the future success of the players, especially in matters of love; and the excitement was sometimes further augmented by some object of value being staked on the event. various modifications of the original principle of the game were gradually introduced, but for practical purposes we may reckon two varieties, (1) in the [greek: kottabos di oxybaphon] shallow saucers ([greek: oxybapha]) were floated in a basin or mixing-bowl filled with water; the object was to sink the saucers by throwing the wine into them, and the competitor who sank the greatest number was considered victorious, and received the prize, which consisted of cakes or sweetmeats. (2) [greek: kottabos kataktos][1] is not so easy to understand, although there is little doubt as to the apparatus. this consisted of a [greek: rhabdos] or bronze rod; a [greek: plastinx], a small disk or basin, resembling a scale-pan; a larger disk ([greek: lekanis]); and (in most cases) a small bronze figure called [greek: manes]. the discovery (by professor helbig in 1886) of two sets of actual apparatus near perugia and various representations on vases help to elucidate the somewhat obscure accounts of the method of playing the game contained in the scholia and certain ancient authors who, it must not be forgotten, wrote at a time when the game itself had become obsolete, and cannot therefore be looked to for a trustworthy description of it. the first specimen of the apparatus found at perugia resembles a candelabrum on a base, tapering towards the top, with a blunt end, on which the small disk (found near the rod), which has a hole near the edge and is slightly hollow in the middle, could be balanced. at about a third of the height of the rod is a large disk with a hole in the centre through which the rod runs; in a socket at the top is a small bronze figure, with right arm and right leg uplifted. in the second specimen there is no large disk, and the figure is holding up what is apparently a rhyton or drinking-horn. according to prof. helbig in _mittheilungen des deutschen archaologischen instituts_ (romische abtheilung i., 1886) three games were played with this apparatus. in the first the smaller disk was placed on the top of the rod, and the object of the player was to dislodge it with a cast of the wine, so that it would fall with a clatter on the larger disk below. in the second (as in the third) the bronze figure was used; the smaller disk was placed above the figure, upon which it fell when hit, and thence on to the larger disk below. in the third, there was no smaller disk; the wine was thrown at the figure, and fell on to the larger disk underneath. another supposed variety, in which two scales were balanced in such a manner that the weight of the liquid cast into either scale caused it to dip down and touch the top of an image placed under each, probably had no real existence, but is due to a confusion of the [greek: plastinx] with a scale-pan by reason of its shape. the game appears to have been of sicilian origin, but it spread through greece from thessaly to rhodes, and was especially fashionable at athens. dionysius, alcaeus, anacreon, pindar, bacchylides, aeschylus, sophocles, euripides, aristophanes, antiphanes, make frequent and familiar allusion to the [greek: kottabos]; but in the writers of the roman and alexandrian period such reference as occurs shows that the fashion had died out. in latin literature it is almost entirely unknown. the most complete treatise on the subject is c. sartori's _das kottabos-spiel der alten griechen_ (1893), in which a full bibliography of ancient and modern authorities is given. english readers may be referred to an article by a. higgins on "recent discoveries of the apparatus used in playing the game of kottabos" (_archaeologia_, li. 1888); see also "kottabos" in daremberg and saglio's _dictionnaire des antiquites_, and l. becq de fouquieres, _les jeux des anciens_ (1873). footnote: [1] the epithet [greek: kataktos] (let down) may refer to the rod, which might be raised or lowered as required; to the lower disk, which might be moved up and down the stem; to the moving up and down of the scales, in the supposed variety of the game mentioned below.