GoGuides Verified Text

COCKER

SHA-256 integrity check: match
Source
Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911) / britannica_1911
License
public_domain
Chunk ID
1911:cocker:8ec1eff7a188
Section
Hash Algorithm
sha256
Stored Hash
e68c9de00b46767bb1919a124668e29718c22eceb1b88e0c359b91b1c820a871
Computed Hash
e68c9de00b46767bb1919a124668e29718c22eceb1b88e0c359b91b1c820a871
Normalizer
ggnorm 1.0
Observed
2026-02-08 18:42:27
Source URL

Verified Text

cocker, edward (1631-1675), the reputed author of the famous _arithmetick_, the popularity of which has added a phrase ("according to cocker") to the list of english proverbialisms, was an english engraver, who also taught writing and arithmetic. he is credited with the authorship and execution of some fourteen sets of copy slips, one of which, _daniel's copy-book, ingraven by edward cocker, philomath_ (1664), is preserved in the british museum. pepys, in his _diary_, makes very favourable mention of cocker, who appears to have displayed great skill in his art. _cocker's arithmetick_, the fifty-second edition of which appeared in 1748, and which has passed through about 112 editions in all, was not published during the lifetime of its reputed author, the first impression bearing date of 1678. augustus de morgan in his _arithmetical books_ (1847) adduces proofs, which may be held to be conclusive, that the work was a forgery of the editor and publisher, john hawkins; and there appears to be no doubt that the _decimal arithmetic_ (1684), and the _english dictionary_ (second edition, 1715), issued by hawkins under cocker's name, are forgeries also. de morgan condemns the _arithmetick_ as a diffuse compilation from older and better works, and dates "a very great deterioration in elementary works on arithmetic" from the appearance of the book, which owed its celebrity far more to persistent puffing than to its merits. he pertinently adds,--"this same edward cocker must have had great reputation, since a bad book under his name pushed out the good ones."