GoGuides Verified Text

BARCLAY

SHA-256 integrity check: match
Source
Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911) / britannica_1911
License
public_domain
Chunk ID
1911:barclay:02f3429c2fab
Section
Hash Algorithm
sha256
Stored Hash
c72410a093aa7ea7efee6b426abf9a14f0f6433e0c3da0dbf15fd52380bb9dc4
Computed Hash
c72410a093aa7ea7efee6b426abf9a14f0f6433e0c3da0dbf15fd52380bb9dc4
Normalizer
ggnorm 1.0
Observed
2026-02-08 18:42:23
Source URL

Verified Text

barclay, john (1582-1621), scottish satirist and latin poet, was born, on the 28th of january 1582, at pont-a-mousson, where his father william barclay held the chair of civil law. his mother was a frenchwoman of good family. his early education was obtained at the jesuit college. while there, at the age of nineteen, he wrote a commentary on the _thebaid_ of statius. in 1603 he crossed with his father to london. barclay had persistently maintained his scottish nationality in his french surroundings, and probably found in james's accession an opportunity which he would not let slip. he did not remain long in england, where he is supposed to have published the first part of his _satyricon_, for in 1605 when a second edition of that book appeared in paris, he was there, having already spent some time in angers, and being now the husband of a french girl, louise debonaire. he returned to london with his wife in 1606, and there published his _sylvae_, a collection of latin poems. in the following year the second part of the _satyricon_ appeared in paris. barclay remained on in london till 1616. in 1609 he edited the _de potestate papae_, an anti-papal treatise by his father, who had died in the preceding year, and in 1611 he issued an _apologia_ or "third part" of the _satyricon_, in answer to the attacks of the jesuits and others who were probably embittered by the tone of the earlier parts of the satire. a so-called "fourth part," with the title of _icon animorum_, appeared in 1614. james i. is said to have been attracted by his scholarship, but particulars of this, or of his life in london generally, are not available. in 1616 he went to rome, for some reason unexplained, and there resided till his death on the 15th of august 1621. he appears to have been on better terms with the church and notably with bellarmine; for in 1617 he issued, from a press at cologne, a _paraenesis ad sectarios_, an attack on the position of protestantism. the literary effort of his closing years was his best-known work the _argenis_, completed about a fortnight before his death, which has been said to have been hastened by poison. the romance was printed in paris in the same year. barclay's contemporary reputation as a writer was of the highest; by his strict scholarship and graceful style he has deserved the praise of modern students. the _satyricon_, a severe satire on the jesuits, is modelled on petronius and catches his lightness of touch, though it shows little or nothing of the tone of its model, or of the unhesitating severity and coarseness of the humanistic satire of barclay's age. the _argenis_ is a long romance, with a monitory purpose on the dangers of political intrigue, probably suggested to him by his experiences of the league in france, and by the catholic plot in england after james's accession. the work has been praised by all parties; and it enjoyed for more than a century after his death a remarkable popularity. most of the innumerable editions are supplied with a key to the characters and names of the story. thus aneroetus is clement viii; _arx non eversa_ is the tower of london; hippophilus and radirobanes are the names of the king of spain; hyanisbe is queen elizabeth; mergania, by an easy anagram, is germany; usinulca, by another, is calvin. the book is of historical importance in the development of 17th century romance, including especially fenelon's telemaque. ben jonson appears, from an entry at stationers' hall on the 2nd of october 1623, to have intended to make a translation. barclay's shorter poems, in two books, were printed in the _delitiae poetarum scotorum_ (amsterdam, 1637, i. pp. 76-136). in the dedication, to prince charles of england, he refers to his earlier publication, the _sylvae_. the best account of barclay is the preface by jules dukas in his bibliography of the _satyricon_ (paris, 1889). this supersedes the life in bayle's _dictionary_, which had been the sole authority. a "fifth part" of the _satyricon_ appears in most of the editions, by alethophilus (claude morisot). for the _argenis_, see the dissertations by leon boucher (paris, 1874), and dupond (paris, 1875). the _icon animorum_ was englished by thomas may in 1631 (_the mirrour of mindes, or barclay's icon animorum_). barclay's works have never been collected.