{
    "system": "GoGuides Verified Text",
    "api_version": "verified-text-v1",
    "status": "ok",
    "response_type": "verified_text_record",
    "source_key": "britannica_1911",
    "source_title": "Encyclopaedia Britannica (1911)",
    "license_code": "public_domain",
    "attribution": null,
    "license_url": null,
    "chunk_id": "1911:apostate:c9b0c36423a7",
    "title": "APOSTATE",
    "section": null,
    "hash_alg": "sha256",
    "hash_sha256": "53e25cfc6fd58b469575e1e60e347eae9f86af1f8f42c606806763800219f5ce",
    "normalizer": {
        "name": "ggnorm",
        "version": "1.0"
    },
    "verified_text": "apostate, roman emperor, was born in constantinople in 331,[1] the son of julius constantius and his wife basilina, and nephew of constantine the great. he was thus a member of the dynasty under whose auspices christianity became the established religion of rome. the name flavius he inherited from his paternal grandfather constantius chlorus; julianus came from his maternal grandfather; claudius had been assumed by constantine's family in order to assert a connexion with claudius gothicus. julian lost his mother not many months after he was born. he was only six when his imperial uncle died; and one of his earliest memories must have been the fearful massacre of his father and kinsfolk, in the interest and more or less at the instigation of the sons of constantine. only julian and his elder half-brother gallus were spared, gallus being too ill and julian too young to excite the fear or justify the cruelty of the murderers. gallus was banished, but julian was allowed to remain in constantinople, where he was carefully educated under the supervision of the family eunuch mardonius, and of eusebius, bishop of nicomedia. about 344 gallus was recalled, and the two brothers were removed to macellum, a remote and lonely castle in cappadocia. julian was trained to the profession of the christian religion; but he became early attracted to the old faith, or rather to the idealized amalgam of paganism and philosophy which was current among his teachers, the rhetoricians. cut off from all sympathy with the reigning belief by the terrible fate of his family, and with no prospect of a public career, he turned with all the eagerness of an enthusiastic temperament to the literary and philosophic studies of the time. the old hellenic world had an irresistible attraction for him. love for its culture was in julian's mind intimately associated with loyalty to its religion. in the meantime the course of events had left as sole autocrat of the roman empire his cousin constantius, who, feeling himself unequal to the enormous task, called julian's brother gallus to a share of power, and in march 351 appointed him caesar. at the same time julian was permitted to return to constantinople, where he studied grammar under nicocles and rhetoric under the christian sophist hecebolius. after a short stay in the capital julian was ordered to remove to nicomedia, where he made the acquaintance of some of the most eminent rhetoricians of the time, and became confirmed in his secret devotion to the pagan faith. he promised not to attend the lectures of libanius, but bought and read them. but his definite conversion to paganism was attributed to the neo-platonist maximus of ephesus, who may have visited him at nicomedia. the downfall of gallus (354), who had been appointed governor of the east, again exposed julian to the greatest danger. by his rash and headstrong conduct gallus had incurred the enmity of constantius and the eunuchs, his confidential ministers, and was put to death. julian fell under a like suspicion, and narrowly escaped the same fate. for some months he was confined at milan (_mediolanum_) till at the intercession of the empress eusebia, who always felt kindly towards him, permission was given him to retire to a small property in bithynia. while he was on his way, constantius recalled him, but allowed--or rather ordered--him to take up his residence at athens. the few months he spent there (july-october 355) were probably the happiest of his life. the emperor constantius and julian were now the sole surviving male members of the family of constantine; and, as the emperor again felt himself oppressed by the cares of government, there was no alternative but to call julian to his assistance. at the instance of the empress he was summoned to milan, where constantius bestowed upon him the hand of his sister helena, together with the title of caesar and the government of gaul. a task of extreme difficulty awaited him beyond the alps. during recent troubles the alamanni and other german tribes had crossed the rhine; they had burned many flourishing cities, and extended their ravages far into the interior of gaul. the internal government of the province had also fallen into great confusion. in spite of his inexperience, julian quickly brought affairs into order. he completely overthrew the alamanni in the great battle of strassburg (august 357). the frankish tribes which had settled on the western bank of the lower rhine were reduced to submission. in gaul he rebuilt the cities which had been laid waste, re-established the administration on a just and secure footing, and as far as possible lightened the taxes, which weighed so heavily on the poor provincials. paris was the usual residence of julian during his government of gaul, and his name has become inseparably associated with the early history of the city. julian's reputation was now established. he was general of a victorious army enthusiastically attached to him and governor of a province which he had saved from ruin; but he had also become an object of fear and jealousy at the imperial court. constantius accordingly resolved to weaken his power. a threatened invasion of the persians was made an excuse for withdrawing some of the best legions from the gallic army. julian recognized the covert purpose of this, yet proceeded to fulfil the commands of the emperor. a sudden movement of the legions themselves decided otherwise. at paris, on the night of the parting banquet, they forced their way into julian's tent, and, proclaiming him emperor, offered him the alternative either of accepting the lofty title or of an instant death. julian accepted the empire, and sent an embassy with a deferential message to constantius. the message being contemptuously disregarded, both sides prepared for a decisive struggle. after a march of unexampled rapidity through the black forest and down the danube, julian reached sirmium, and was on the way to constantinople, when he received news of the death of constantius, who had set out from syria to meet him, at mopsucrene in cilicia (nov. 3, 361). without further trouble julian found himself everywhere acknowledged the sole ruler of the roman empire; it is even asserted that constantius himself on his death-bed had designated him his successor. julian entered constantinople on the 11th of december 361. julian had already made a public avowal of paganism, of which he had been a secret adherent from the age of twenty. it was no ordinary profession, but the expression of a strong and even enthusiastic conviction; the restoration of the pagan worship was to be the great aim and controlling principle of his government. his reign was too short to show what precise form the pagan revival might ultimately have taken, how far his feelings might have become embittered by his conflict with the christian faith, whether persecution, violence and civil war might not have taken the place of the moral suasion which was the method he originally affected. he issued an edict of universal toleration; but in many respects he used his imperial influence unfairly to advance the work of restoration. in order to deprive the christians of the advantages of culture, and discredit them as an ignorant sect, he forbade them to teach rhetoric. the symbols of paganism and of the imperial dignity were so artfully interwoven on the standards of the legions that they could not pay the usual homage to the emperor without seeming to offer worship to the gods; and, when the soldiers came forward to receive the customary donative, they were required to throw a handful of incense on the altar. without directly excluding christians from the high offices of state, he held that the worshippers of the gods ought to have the preference. in short, though there was no direct persecution, he exerted much more than a moral pressure to restore the power and prestige of the old faith. having spent the winter of 361-362 at constantinople, julian proceeded to antioch to prepare for his great expedition against persia. his stay there was a curious episode in his life. it is doubtful whether his pagan convictions or his ascetic life, after the fashion of an antique philosopher, gave most offence to the so-called christians of the dissolute city. they soon grew heartily tired of each other, and julian took up his winter quarters at tarsus, from which in early spring he marched against persia. at the head of a powerful and well-appointed army he advanced through mesopotamia and assyria as far as ctesiphon, near which he crossed the tigris, in face of a persian army which he defeated. misled by the treacherous advice of a persian nobleman, he desisted from the siege, and set out to seek the main army of the enemy under shapur ii. (q.v.). after a long, useless march he was forced to retreat, and found himself enveloped by the whole persian army, in a waterless and desolate country, at the hottest season of the year. the romans repulsed the enemy in many an obstinate battle, but on the 26th of june 363 julian, who was ever in the front, was mortally wounded. the same night he died in his tent. in the most authentic historian of his reign, ammianus marcellinus, we find a noble speech, which he is said to have addressed to his afflicted officers. soon after his death the rumour spread that the fatal wound had been inflicted by a christian in the roman army. the well-known statement, first found in theodoret (fl. 5th century), that julian threw his blood towards heaven, exclaiming, \"thou hast conquered, o galilean!\" is probably a development of the account of his death in the poems of ephraem syrus. from julian's unique position as the last champion of a dying polytheism, his character has always excited interest. authors such as gregory of nazianzus have heaped the fiercest anathemas upon him; but a just and sympathetic criticism finds many noble qualities in his character. in childhood and youth he had learned to regard christianity as a persecuting force. the only sympathetic friends he met were among the pagan rhetoricians and philosophers; and he found a suitable outlet for his restless and inquiring mind only in the studies of ancient greece. in this way he was attracted to the old paganism; but it was a paganism idealized by the philosophy of the time. in other respects julian was no unworthy successor of the antonines. though brought up in a studious and pedantic solitude, he was no sooner called to the government of gaul than he displayed all the energy, the hardihood and the practical sagacity of an old roman. in temperance, self-control and zeal for the public good, as he understood it, he was unsurpassed. to these roman qualities he added the culture, literary instincts and speculative curiosity of a greek. one of the most remarkable features of his public life was the perfect ease and mastery with which he associated the cares of war and statesmanship with the assiduous cultivation of literature and philosophy. yet even his devotion to culture was not free from pedantry and dilettantism. his contemporaries observed in him a want of naturalness. he had not the moral health or the composed and reticent manhood of a roman, or the spontaneity of a greek. he was never at rest; in the rapid torrent of his conversation he was apt to run himself out of breath; his manner was jerky and spasmodic. he showed quite a deferential regard for the sophists and rhetoricians of the time, and advanced them to high offices of state; there was real cause for fear that he would introduce the government of pedants in the roman empire. last of all, his love for the old philosophy was sadly disfigured by his devotion to the old superstitions. he was greatly given to divination; he was noted for the number of his sacrificial victims. wits applied to him the joke that had been passed on marcus aurelius: \"the white cattle to marcus caesar, greeting. if you conquer, there is an end of us.\" bibliography.--the works of julian, of which there are complete editions by e. spanheim (leipzig, 1696) and f. c. hertlein (teubner series, 1875-1876), consist of the following: (1) _letters_, of which more than eighty have been preserved under his name, although the genuineness of several has been disputed. for his views on religious toleration and his attitude towards christians and jews the most important are 25-27, 51, 52, and the fragment in hertlein, i. 371. the letter of gallus to julian, warning him against reverting to heathenism, is probably a christian forgery. six new letters were discovered in 1884 by a. papadopulos kerameus in a monastery on the island of chalcis near constantinople (see _rheinisches museum_, xlii., 1887). separate edition of the letters by l. h. heyler (1828); see also j. bidez and f. cumont, \"recherches sur la tradition ms. des lettres de l'empereur julian\" in _memoires couronnes ... publies par l'acad. royale de belgique_, lvii. (1898) and f. cumont, _sur l'authenticite de quelques lettres de julien_ (1889). (2) _orations_, eight in number--two panegyrics on constantius, one on the empress eusebia, two theosophical declamations on king helios and the mother of the gods, two essays on true and false cynicism, and a consolatory address to himself on the departure of his friend salustius to the east. (3) _caesares or symposium_, a satirical composition after the manner of seneca's _apocolocyntosis_, in which the deified caesars appear in succession at a banquet given in olympus, to be censured for their vices and crimes by old silenus. (4) _misopogon_ (the beard-hater), written at antioch, a satire on the licentiousness of its inhabitants; while at the same time his own person and manner of life are treated in a whimsical spirit. it also contains a charming description of lutetia (paris). it owes its name to the ridicule heaped upon his beard by the antiocheans, who were in the habit of shaving. (5) five epigrams, two of which (_anth. pal._, ix. 365, 368) are of some interest. (6) [greek: kara christianon] (_adversus christianos_) in three books, an attack on christianity written during the persian campaign, is lost. theodosius ii. ordered all copies of it to be destroyed, and our knowledge of its contents is derived almost entirely from the _contra julianum_ of cyril, bishop of alexandria, written sixty years later (see _juliani librorum contra christianos quae supersunt_, ed. c. j. neumann 1880). _english translations_: select works by j. duncombe (1784) containing all except the first seven orations (viii. and the fable from vii. are included): the theosophical addresses to king helios and the mother of the gods by thomas taylor (1793) and c. w. king in bohn's _classical library_ (1888); the public letters, by e. j. chinnock (1901). authorities.--1. _ancient_: (a) pagan writers. of these the most trustworthy and impartial is the historian ammianus marcellinus (xv. 8-xxv.), a contemporary and in part an eye-witness of the events he describes (other historians are zosimus and eutropius); the sophist libanius, who in speaking of his imperial friend shows himself creditably free from exaggeration and servility; eunapius (in his lives of maximus, oribasius, the physician and friend of julian, and prohaeresius) and claudius mamertinus, the panegyrist, are less trustworthy. (b) christian writers. gregory of nazianzus, the author of two violent invectives against julian; rufinus; socrates; sozomen; theodoret; philostorgius; the poems of ephraem syrus written in 363; zonaras; cedrenus; and later byzantine chronographers. the impression which julian produced on the christians of the east is reflected in two syriac romances published by j. g. e. hoffmann, _julianos der abtrunnige_ (1880; see also th. noldeke in _zeitschrift der deutschen morgenlandischen gesellschaft_ [1874], xxviii. 263). 2. _modern._ for works before 1878 see r. engelmann, _scriptores graeci_ (8th ed., by e. preuss, 1880). of later works the most important are g. h. rendall, _the emperor julian, paganism and christianity_ (1879); alice gardner, _julian, philosopher and emperor_ (1895); g. negri, _julian the apostate_ (eng. trans., 1905); e. muller, _kaiser flavius claudius julianus_ (1901); p. allard, _julien l'apostat_ (1900-1903); g. mau, _die religionsphilosophie kaiser julians in seinen reden auf konig helios und die gottermutter_ (1907); j. e. sandys, _hist. of classical scholarship_ (1906), p. 356; w. christ, _geschichte der griechischen litteratur_ (1898), § 603; j. geffcken, \"kaiser julianus und die streitschriften seiner gegner,\" in _neue jahrb. f. das klassische altertum_ (1908), pp. 161-195. the sketch by gibbon (_decline and fall_, chs. xix., xxii.-xxiv.) and the articles by j. wordsworth in smith's _dictionary of christian biography_ and a. harnack in herzog-hauck's _realencyklopadie fur protestantische theologie_ ix. (1901) are valuable, the last especially for the bibliography. (t. k.; j. h. f.) footnote: [1] for the date of julian's birth see gibbon's _decline and fall_ (ed. bury), ii. 247, note 11. the choice seems to lie between may 331 and may 332. if the former be adopted, julian must have died in the thirty-third, not the thirty-second, year of his age (as stated in ammianus marcellinus, xxv. 3, 23). julich (fr. _juliers_), a town of germany, in the prussian rhine province, on the right bank of the roer, 16 m. n.e. of aix-la-chapelle. pop. (1900), 5459. it contains an evangelical and two roman catholic churches, a gymnasium, a school for non-commissioned officers, which occupies the former ducal palace, and a museum of local antiquities. its manufactures include sugar, leather and paper. julich (formerly also gulch, guliche) the capital of the former duchy of that name, is the juliacum of the _antonini itinerarium_; some have attributed its origin to julius caesar. it became a fortress in the 17th century, and was captured by the archduke leopold in 1609, by the dutch under maurice of orange in 1610, and by the spaniards in 1622. in 1794 it was taken by the french, who held it until the peace of paris in 1814. till 1860, when its works were demolished, julich ranked as a fortress of the second class. julich, or juliers, duchy of. in the 9th century a certain matfried was count of julich (pagus juliacensis), and towards the end of the 11th century one gerhard held this dignity. this gerhard founded a family of hereditary counts, who held julich as immediate vassals of the emperor, and in 1356 the county was raised to the rank of a duchy. the older and reigning branch of the family died in 1423, when julich passed to adolph, duke of berg (d. 1437), who belonged to a younger branch, and who had obtained berg by virtue of the marriage of one of his ancestors. nearly a century later mary (d. 1543) the heiress of these two duchies, married john, the heir of the duchy of cleves, and in 1521 the three duchies, julich, berg and cleves, together with the counties of ravensberg and la marck, were united under john's sway. john died in 1539 and was succeeded by his son william who reigned until 1592. at the beginning of the 17th century the duchies became very prominent in european politics. the reigning duke, john william, was childless and insane, and several princes were only waiting for his demise in order to seize his lands. the most prominent of these princes were two protestant princes, philip louis, count palatine of neuburg, who was married to the duke's sister anna, and john sigismund, elector of brandenburg, whose wife was the daughter of another sister. two other sisters were married to princes of minor importance. moreover, by virtue of an imperial promise made in 1485 and renewed in 1495, the elector of saxony claimed the duchies of julich and berg, while the proximity of the coveted lands to the netherlands made their fate a matter of great moment to the dutch. when it is remembered that at this time there was a great deal of tension between the roman catholics and the protestants, who were fairly evenly matched in the duchies, and that the rivalry between france and the empire was very keen, it will be seen that the situation lacked no element of discord. in march 1609 duke john william died. having assured themselves of the support of henry iv. of france and of the evangelical union, brandenburg and neuburg at once occupied the duchies. to counter this stroke and to support the saxon claim, the emperor rudolph ii. ordered some imperialist and spanish troops to seize the disputed lands, and it was probably only the murder of henry iv. in may 1610 and the death of the head of the evangelical union, the elector palatine, frederick iv., in the following september, which prevented, or rather delayed, a great european war. about this time the emperor adjudged the duchies to saxony, while the dutch captured the fortress of julich; but for all practical purposes victory remained with the \"possessing princes,\" as brandenburg and neuburg were called, who continued to occupy and to administer the lands. these two princes had made a compact at dortmund in 1609 to act together in defence of their rights, but proposals for a marriage alliance between the two houses broke down and differences soon arose between them. the next important step was the timely conversion of the count palatine's heir, wolfgang william of neuburg, to roman catholicism, and his marriage with a daughter of the powerful roman catholic prince, duke maximilian of bavaria. the rupture between the possessing princes was now complete. each invited foreign aid. dutch troops marched to assist the elector of brandenburg and spanish ones came to aid the count palatine, but through the intervention of england and france peace was made and the treaty of xanten was signed in november 1614. by this arrangement brandenburg obtained julich and berg, the rest of the lands falling to the count palatine. in 1666 the great elector, frederick william of brandenburg, made with william, count palatine of neuburg, a treaty of mutual succession to the duchies, providing that in case the male line of either house became extinct the other should inherit its lands. the succession to the duchy of julich was again a matter of interest in the earlier part of the 18th century. the family of the counts palatine of neuburg was threatened with extinction and the emperor charles vi. promised the succession to julich to the prussian king, frederick william i., in return for a guarantee of the pragmatic sanction. a little later, however, he promised the same duchy to the count palatine of sulzbach, a kinsman of the count palatine of neuburg. then frederick the great, having secured silesia, abandoned his claim to julich, which thus passed to sulzbach when, in 1742, the family of neuburg became extinct. from sulzbach the duchy came to the electors palatine of the rhine, and, when this family died out in 1799, to the elector of bavaria, the head of the other branch of the house of wittelsbach. in 1801 julich was seized by france, and by the settlement of 1815 it came into the hands of prussia. its area was just over 1600 sq. m. and its population about 400,000. see kuhl, _geschichte der stadt julich_; m. ritter, _sachsen und der julicher erbfolgestreit_ (1873), and _der julicher erbfolgekrieg, 1610 und 1611_ (1877); a. muller, _der julich-klevesche erbfolgestreit im jahre 1614_ (1900) and h. h. koch, _die reformation im herzogtum julich_ (1883-1888).",
    "source_url": "https://archive.org/details/EB1911WMF",
    "observed_at": "2026-02-08 18:43:15",
    "integrity": {
        "hash_check": "match",
        "hash_scope": "full_normalized_text",
        "computed_sha256": "53e25cfc6fd58b469575e1e60e347eae9f86af1f8f42c606806763800219f5ce"
    },
    "machine_use": {
        "read": true,
        "cite": true,
        "decision": "verified_public_domain_text"
    },
    "documentation": {
        "white_paper_url": "https://www.goguides.com/white-paper.php",
        "pdf_url": "https://www.goguides.com/whitepapers/goguides-ai-source-clearance-white-paper.pdf"
    }
}